Things That Just Piss Me Off

What Pisses You Off?   

27 January 2008

Hillary Clinton And Mainstream Media Puts Out False Message - Obama Winning

posted in: Politics — namecritic @ 8:40 pm

The media seems to want Hillary Clinton to succeed at any cost. They keep slanting things in such a way as to make it appear that she is winning the race for the democratic nomination. They talk about Nevada as if she won there. They talk about her win in New Hampshire, the famous crying for the vote scene.

It’s not true. She is not winning this race and everyone should be happy about that. People that want things to stay the way they are in Washington want Hillary Clinton to win. For 20 years two families have controlled the white house. The bushes and the clintons.

It’s time for a change. No more bushes and no more clintons! They haven’t made any positive changes in washington in 20 years, we don’t need more of these two families in power.

Back to who is winning the race for the democratic nomination. Here are the facts;

1. Obama has received more overall votes than Hillary Clinton.

2. Obama won more delegates than Hillary Clinton in Nevada.

3. Obama has won more delegates than Hillary Clinton.

Yet the media and Hillary Clinton keep slanting things to make it appear she is winning or that they are tied, etc. They want to influence people to vote for Hillary Clinton by making her look like a winner. And still Obama keeps beating her.

McCain, Romney, Giuliani, and Clinton all represent business as usual in Washington. If we are ever going to change things, we have to change the way we normally vote and get some new blood in the whitehouse. We need to do it now before it’s too late to change things.

Obama and Ron Paul represent change in Washington. They want to actually represent the people of this country. So if you are republican and want change vote for Ron Paul. If you are a democrat, vote for Barack Obama. Either way we all win and change can happen.

Don’t fear change! Embrace it! It’s been too long since any real changes happened in Washington. Reagan made changes. JFK made changes. Let’s send the bushes and the clintons packing!

25 January 2008

O’Reilly The Pinhead Strikes Again

posted in: News, War — namecritic @ 6:38 am

Cmon, who really listens to this idiot and believes anything he says. John Edwards says there are 200,000 homeless veterans. Bill O’Reilly said there are not 200,000 homeless veterans. He gets proven wrong and finds out there are after calling Edwards a liar and now says Edwards owes HIM the apology.

The following is a transcript of the show where Bill O’Reilly is proven to be a liar but refuses to admit he is wrong no matter what.

O’REILLY: To hype up this class warfare, Edwards is now bringing in homeless veterans.

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

EDWARDS: Tonight, across this country, 200,000 men and women who wore our uniform and can serve this country patriotically, veterans, will go to sleep under bridges and on grates.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

O’REILLY: Now I’ve said on this program that we will pay for homeless veterans to be taken to the Edwards mansion in North Carolina for shelter. Of course, that’s an immature remark, I know that, but there’s a reason I’m saying it.

Certainly there are homeless veterans, but it’s not because of the economy. It’s mostly because of addiction and mental illness, something politicians can do little about.

Some people, including veterans, do become homeless because of the economy. They lose their jobs and become homeless. It happens. It is not because of mental illness or addiction for everyone who becomes homeless nor is that the only way veterans become homeless.

Bill O’Reilly the pinhead will distort any fact to make his point and to get people to believe he actually knows something.

Then he says politicians can do nothing about homeless veterans. regardless of why these veterans are homeless, the government could and should be doing more to help them. To claim that politicians can do nothing to help them is ridiculous.

These veterans served our country and deserve better than what they are getting when they return home. If they are mentally ill or addicted to alcohol or drugs then we should pay for everything that needs to be done to help them overcome it. We should do whatever we have to do to be sure they are not sleeping on the streets, period.

Bush does nothing for the veterans and he has rush limbaugh and pinhead o’reilly covering it up and trying to convince people no problem exists. By convincing people there is no problem bsuh and other politicians won’t be held accountable for the poor treatment of our veterans.

But if Edwards admits the truth, it takes away the class warfare issue, which is his only issue. […]

Right there is no diversity that causes the rich to get richer while the poor get poorer. This doesn’t even have anything to do with bush or republicans or democrats. This has to do with people rich enough to make sure everyone else remains their own private labor pool. It’s a fact.

O’REILLY: Yet according to the government census, poor households in America have lots of stuff. 97 percent have a color TV, 78 percent a DVD player, 80 percent an air conditioner, 73 percent a car or truck, 63 percent cable or satellite TV, and 43 percent of poor households in the USA own the home they are living in.

Here is a great example of how pinhead o’reilly distorts the truth and distracts his listeners or viewers. The statistics he just mentioned show percentages of “households” that have stuff. The homeless are not included in those statisitics. They don’t have households.

If you added the number of people who are homeless to those statistics, people aho have no color tvs and dvd players, those percentages would be cut by at least 1/4. So about 75% of americans have the color tv and 55% a dvd player and so on.

But pinhead o’reilly uses statistics that have nothing to do with the homeless veterans he was mistaken about. He is using those to distract viewers.

So if the poor are not destitute in America, and they obviously are not, why are so many veterans sleeping under bridges, John Edwards? The answer again they’re mostly addicted or mentally ill. It has nothing to do with the economy.

Again, not all homeless veterans are addicts. Those who are should be getting treatment in a hospital, not sleeping under a bridge. All homeless veterans are not mentally ill. Of those who are, most of them have a mental illness due to their service to our country. They sho0uld be receiving the help they need but they don’t. There are actually homeless veterans who are not addicts or mentally ill and that is due to the economy. So pinhead is wrong and he is a liar.

Edwards is a charlatan, a man either too uninformed or too dishonest to be elected to anything. I am tired of hearing this nonsense from him and other callow politicians. We deal with facts here on The Factor, not fiction. John Edwards owes us an apology. […]

Facts, O’reilly, and fox news should never be used in the same sentence. O’reilly owes America and every veteran in America an apology.

JOSEPH CALIFANO: We have 200,000 veterans who are homeless.

O’REILLY: Right. […]

Oops. You mean there really are 200,000 homeless veterans and o’reilly was wrong? Will he admit it? Tune in and see.

O’REILLY: But this is wrong for a major presidential candidate to demagogue this issue and try to tell the people it’s America’s economic system that’s causing this problem, is a lie, it’s wrong, he should be called on it. […]

Hey! Pinhead O’Reilly. You just got called on your lie and you don’t admit it nor do you apologize to our veterans, so why do you still insist it’s edwards who lied?

CALIFANO: This is not the only issue that happens to, Bill. Let me just say there’s enormous denial about this.

O’REILLY: I’m not in denial. I don’t think any…[…]

CALIFANO: I - well, they don’t want - they don’t to - they don’t recognize that substance abuse…

O’REILLY: They recognize.

CALIFANO: Drives all our social ills.

O’REILLY: Edwards knows this. He’s lying. He’s lying. He knows it. Everybody knows it.

CALIFANO: I don’t believe that John Edwards is lying.

O’REILLY: Then he’s dumb.

CALIFANO: No, he’s not.

O’REILLY: One or the other. […]

O’REILLY: But I hope you understand my anger. It’s an anger that if you want to solve the problem for the veterans, let’s be honest about it. Let’s not demagogue it like Edwards is doing.

Why don’t you be honest about it Mr. Pinhead. You slammed the veterans and you do not apologize. You are trying to save face because you thought you knew everything and found out you didn’t know anything about the homeless veteran problem

Admit you made a mistake. Admit you lied. Admit you insulted a lot of homeless veterans by saying they are all mentally ill and addicts. Admit that our government, including the bush administration, treats our veterans poorly. I only added the bush administration because they are currently sending men and women over to fight in Iraq right now and I do not want them treated the same way when they return home.

But I guess pinhead o’reilly doesn’t care about them at all. His statements prove it.

The Rest of The Story And Video Here

23 January 2008

GoDaddy Hosting Just Sucks

posted in: Internet, Main — namecritic @ 6:37 pm

There is no nice way to say it. GoDaddy hosting is not worth spending 5 cents per month on. Honestly, if you are going to worry so much about getting cheap hosting, you will end up with cheap hosting.

If you are running a business and you are worried whether or not your hosting will cost an extra $100 somewhere else, then you should stop right now and not open your business because you will not ever make money on the web.

Seriously, if you think that extra money you might pay a better hosting company is going to make or break your business, get a day job and forget about it. It takes money to make money.

GoDaddy hosting can’t even get a wordpress installation right. This is something almost anyone can do in 7 minutes. I run a lot of blogs for clients and some of them have been on GoDaddy Hosting. Not one time has GoDaddy ever gotten it done correctly.

If you have cpanel at your hosting company, you can even install wordpress in about 3 minutes with fantastico. But with the GoDaddy hosting control panel you click to install wordpress and it just means they will do it for you.

I’ve had them install it into a folder after clearly telling them to install it into the root of the domain name. So now more time has to be spent to explain it to them again, have them uninstall it then reinstall it where I told them to do it in the first place.

Half the time they don’t even install the latest version of wordpress anyway. Then you have to manually update it to the newest version. An update is not as good as a clean install of the version you want.

You can’t use custom permalink structure for the blog. Godaddy hosting either does not have mod rewrite or they have screwed it up or they purposely don’t allow it. Either way a blog is much better off with good permalink structure for seo purposes. Since you can’t do that at godaddy hosting, then I would never use them.

GoDaddy is well known so people think they must be good. Anyone who has money can advertise and be well known. It does not mean they are good at anything.

Godaddy uses floating servers and floating MySQL. You do not know who else is on your IP Block. There are spammers, porn websites, warez websites, and other types of websites you do not want on your IP Block or “neighborhood”.

Would you open your clothing store in a neighborhood next to a massage parlor, a topless bar, a crack house, a bookie, etc.

If the answer is no quit signing up with cheap hosting. Spammers use cheap hosting. If you are in that same IP Block or neighborhood, your domain name can be punished along with them.

Suffice it to say, my company now turns away all seo business, blog management business, or any other business where we might have anything to do with GoDaddy Hosting.

Your mileage may vary. I’m sure some people will run in and defend GoDaddy Hosting. Go for it. My experience with GoDaddy hosting precludes me from ever doing business with them again.

Hillary Clinton Negative Campaign Tactics

posted in: Politics — namecritic @ 12:25 am

I watched the democratic debates and have been following the campaigns of each candidate in both parties as much as possible. In this post I just want to talk about Hillary Clinton.

First, Hillary Clinton. There are a few things that concern me about her.

1. She says she doesn’t want this race to be about gender. She doesn’t want women to vote for her just because she is a woman. Then she goes on into “even though only a woman can know about what women go through”, etc. She says this in every single appearance. She says it often enough to make sure that the race is partly about getting women to vote for her because she is a woman.

It’s like someone being applauded onstage and them continually saying, “oh, no please, no more applause, please, really, no more applause, really.”

Hillary Clinton keeps telling women, “oh please no, don’t vote for me because I’m a woman, please, really, don’t vote for me just for that reason. I know I know, I know women’s issues better because I’m a woman, but oh no, please, really, don’t vote for me for that reason, really.”

2. The “My 35 years of experience thing” is really getting tired. She says it over and over so that people will think she actually has 35 years of experience in government. She doesn’t. Let’s clear that up once and for all.

Hillary Rodham Clinton was elected to the United States Senate by the people of New York on November 7, 2000. That means as of the writing of this blog post, she has exactly, 7 years, 2 months, and 22 days experience in government.

Other than that, she has been the wife of someone who has experience as a Governor and as a President.

If your husband is an auto mechanic and has been for 20 years, then you decide you want to be an auto mechanic and do so for 7 years, you can’t claim you have 27 years experience as an auto mechanic.

Experience is nontransferable. You don’t get experience through osmosis.

The rest of her experience is in the private sector as a lawyer. She sat on some boards of nonprofit organizations. I’ve put together boards for nonprofits before. Having the wife of the governor on the board lends creditbility to the charity. So it does not surprise me she got to sit on some boards.

She also sat on the board of Wal-Mart. Having the wife of the governor on their board wasn’t a bad move for them since their was state legislation that could have stopped Wal-Mart from opening stores in places where it would put mom and pop businesses out of business. None of that passed of course and Wal-Mart can open anywhere they want.

3. Bill Clinton is a former President, not just Hillary Clinton’s husband. There is supposed to be some dignity in being a formaer US President. Bill Clinton seems to have forgotten that in favor of supporting Hillary at all costs.

She is counting on women to vote for her and counting on everyone thinking that by electing her, they are re-electing Bill Clinton. Electing Hillary Clinton is not the same as electing Bill Clinton. She doesn’t have a good record of her own to stand on and hoping voters will forget that because Bill is outn there talking for her. She is hoping voters will believe his record is also her record. It’s not.

4. She voted for the war. Nuff said. She says she regrets it. Ok. But you still voted for the war. Since then you voted the way Bush wanted you to on Iran and other issues having to do with Iraq. So as much as you regret voting for the war, it doesn’t seem to affect you voting on things that might lead to another war with iran. If you regretted helping Bush start the Iraq war, you would not be helping him start another war in Iran.

5. 2 Family Dynasties have been in office for 20 years. For 20 years, either a Bush or a Clinton has been in office. Electing Hillary could mean another 8 years. If a Bush runs and gets elected again after that, it could be another 8 years. That would be 36 years of the white house in the hands of two families.

Time to break that chain. It’s dangerous. It’s nepotism. It’s not democracy at it’s finest. No more Bushes. No more Clintons.

22 January 2008

Bush Selling America to the Saudis

posted in: Politics — namecritic @ 3:46 pm

Bush says he will protect us from the evil terrorists. Bush says he will protect our borders to be sure the terrorists aren’t getting in. Bush says he will stimulate the economy and create new jobs.

The Bush family has been in business with the Saudis for a long time. Not only them, other governments as well. Bush’s grandfather, Prescott Bush even did business with Hitler in WW2. Their family is all about making money regardless of how it affects this country.

GW Bush’s economic policies benefit his family and their friends. It benefits the rich. It benefits corporate interests. It benefits everyone in the oil business. It benefits his Saudi friends who helped him make money in the oil business.

Our soldiers are over in Iraq dying because the Saudis needed us to get rid of one of their biggest threats. Next is Iran if Bush can find a way to help them there as well.

Overseas Investors Buy Aggressively in U.S.
by PETER S. GOODMAN and LOUISE STORY of the NYTimes

Last May, a Saudi Arabian conglomerate bought a Massachusetts plastics maker. For much of the world, the United States is now on sale at discount prices. With credit tight, unemployment growing and worries mounting about a potential recession, American business and government leaders are courting foreign money to keep the economy growing. Foreign investors are buying aggressively, taking advantage of American duress and a weak dollar to snap up what many see as bargains, while making inroads to the world’s largest market.

Last year, foreign investors poured a record $414 billion into securing stakes in American companies, factories and other properties through private deals and purchases of publicly traded stock, according to Thomson Financial, a research firm. That was up 90 percent from the previous year and more than double the average for the last decade. It amounted to more than one-fourth of all announced deals for the year, Thomson said.

This is the result of Bush’s economic policies and his spend spend spend policy of government. He says he will stimulate the economy. He will. By selling it out to the highest bidder even if it is our enemy.

The Saudis fund terrorism around the world yet they are allowed to come in and buy up corporations.

We all know that large corporations donate to political campaigns and that their lobbyists influence how they vote. it’s a fact on both the republican and democratic side of politics.

By selling these corporations to foreign governments and foreign corporations, that influence will be wielded by those countries. How many seats in the senate do we want the Saudis to control? Might as well make them a political party themselves.

But they don’t need that. They can just buy the ones we already have. Having such a poor economic policy has led to more and more corporations being bought by foriegn investors. To believe that these investors have no other agenda than to make investments for profit is just naive.

Think about it. If you wanted to influence US Foriegn and Domestic Policy, how would you do it? You know the pharmaceutical companies have a lot of influence. You know the oil companies have a lot of influence. You know the telecommunications companies have a lot of influence. So you buy enough stock in those companies to give you influence over what the companies do and you indirectly influence the government as well.

How about NewsCorp or Clear Channel Communications? They control a lot of the news we hear daily. If the Saudis bought those companies then they would control the news you hear. That ok with you?

With a growing share of investment coming from so-called sovereign wealth funds — vast pools of money controlled by governments from China to the Middle East — lawmakers and regulators are calling for greater scrutiny to ensure that foreign countries do not gain influence over the financial system or military-related technology.

foriegn investment

The most conspicuous beneficiaries are Wall Street banks like Merrill Lynch, Citigroup and Morgan Stanley, which have sold stakes to government-controlled funds in Asia and the Middle East to compensate for calamitous losses on mortgage markets. Beneath the headlines, a more profound shift is under way: Foreign entities last year captured stakes in American companies in businesses as diverse as real estate, steel-making, energy and baby food.

Our banks sell government funds to the Saudis and China while Bush cheers them on as catalysts to stimulating the economy.

bushonomics

Land ownership was one of the cornerstones of the founding of this country. In most countries you have to be a citizen to own land there. Here it is being sold to foreign investors so less and less of our land is owned by Americans.

And you want a country that funds terrorism to even be the distributors of the food your babies eat? Bush tells us the terrorists will do anything to harm us. He instills fear in us about the terrorists. Then he turns around and does business with the largest supporter of international terrorism, the Saudis?

The Saudi Royal Family plays friendly with the US and does business with the oil companies and George Bush because it benefits them. In the meantime they turn a blind eye to highly placed people in their government who support terrorism. They even give them money to do it.

They know their days are numbered and that bribing the terrorists not to attack them is not going to last forever. When the extremists take over Saudi Arabia, the royals will flee the country and live on a huge estate somewhere while the extremists take over any interests the saudi government owns.

Bushonomics means the rich get richer, the middle class scrapes by, the poor get poorer, and foreign investors take over the economy.

bushonomics

Also from the NYTimes

saudi industrialisation
A detail from a rendering of the King Abdullah Economic City, on the Red Sea. It is one of six new cities planned by Saudi Arabia as it works to diversify its economy beyond oil exports

More than 38,000 workers from China, India, Turkey and beyond have been toiling for two years to complete one of the world’s largest petrochemical plants in record time. By the end of the year, plastics produced here will be used to make televisions in Japan, cellphones in China and thousands of other products to be sold in the United States and Europe.

“The Saudi economy was in idle mode for 20 years,” said John Sfakianakis, the chief economist at SABB, formerly known as the Saudi British Bank, who is based in Riyadh, the Saudi capital. “Today, the feeling here is, ‘We’ve won the lottery; let’s not waste it.’ ”

The kingdom’s lofty economic goals would have been unthinkable without the surge in energy prices that has filled the coffers of oil producers. Oil prices have quadrupled since 2002 and reached $100 a barrel in New York this month.

Projects like Petro Rabigh will allow Saudi Arabia to become one of the top three chemical producers in the world within a few years.

Persian Gulf countries earned $1.5 trillion in oil revenue from 2002 to 2006, twice as much as in the previous five-year period, according to the Institute of International Finance, a global association of banks that is based in Washington. As the top exporter, Saudi Arabia has been the main beneficiary.

Imagine that. Under George Bush’s watch the oil producing countries made more money than ever with Saudi Arabia making the lions share. I’m sure that has nothing at all to do with the Saudis being the primary reason the Bush family made money in the oil business.

Last year, for example, a fund controlled by the government of Abu Dhabi bought a stake in Citigroup for $7.5 billion, while another run by Dubai’s ruler bought a large share in Sony, the Japanese consumer electronics giant. Sabic, a major Saudi petrochemical company, bought the plastics division of General Electric for $11.6 billion, and the Kuwait Petroleum Corporation bought half of Dow Chemical’s commodity-plastics unit for $9.5 billion.

In recent weeks, other big banks plagued by losses from the mortgage crisis, like Merrill Lynch and Morgan Stanley, have raised tens of billions of dollars from a variety of Middle Eastern and Asian funds, including ones from Kuwait or Saudi Arabia.

According to data compiled by Bloomberg News, overseas investments by Persian Gulf countries reached a record $75 billion in 2007. Arms deals, a time-worn way of recycling petrodollars, remain popular in the region; the United States is pushing for a $20 billion weapons sale to Saudi Arabia, for example. Oil-rich states are still buying American Treasury bonds and military hardware from the West.

We do not learn from our own history or the owners of the large corporations and the Bush family doesn’t care. Everytime we sell weapons to these sponsors of terrorism they end up used against our own soldiers and even our civilians. We gave weapons to Saddam hussein. We gave weapons to Osama Bin Laden. And now we give them to Saudi Arabia.

21 January 2008

Bush Economic Policy Explained - The Rich Get Richer - The Poor Stay Poor

posted in: Politics — namecritic @ 3:00 pm

And the middle class gets ignored as much as possible. Those are the three key elements to every economic plan Bush puts out. This story in the NYTimes will show you how that policy works.

Tax Rebate or Payment? A Policy Debate Begins
By EDMUND L. ANDREWS

Nearly 40 percent of Americans owed no federal income tax last year, though even low-income workers paid taxes for Social Security and Medicare. While Mr. Bush has refused to disclose specifics of his $145 billion plan, administration officials and Republican lawmakers favor a proposal that would offer rebates of up to $800 for individuals and $1,600 for families — but only if they paid that much in taxes last year.

Many of those people who paid no federal income tax paid no tax because they are barely supporting their families from paycheck to paycheck and they legitimately owed no taxes to the government.

They paid sales tax. They spent money. They paid unemployement. They paid medicare. They do all they can.

But Bush and the republican party does not want them to get any relief. Only if you made enough to support your family and still owed taxes should you get anything according to them.

Here’s the rub. One guy works at mcdonalds and has taxes taken out of his check every week. He files his taxes. He gets all of it back because he was supporting his family just barely.

The other guy works construction. Doesn’t have taxes taken out of his check, but pays the amount that he owes at the end of the year. And he owed a little money because he made more than the fry cook. He deserves a break while the fry cook doesn’t?

Guy number three is a bigshot at XYZ corp. and makes over $100,000 per year. Doing well. So he gets the biggest break of all.

This is the bush logic of stimulating the economy? Give more money to the people that have more money? They have money in savings. The fry cook doesn’t.

The money you give back to the guy with savings just adds it to his savings. No immediate need to spend it so no economic boost.

The money you give back to the fry cook and likely the construction worker gets spent right away because they needed the money in the first place and had no savings. Immediate economic boost for the economy.

Bush says this is to boost the economy but it does exactly the opposite. Another tax break for the rich disguised as an economic stimulus package.

For practical purposes, analysts estimate, a family of four with an income of $24,000 would receive no government payments at all.

How many of you make $2000 per month or less? Bush and the republican party don’t believe you should receive any relief from the recession they have created. You aren’t valuable to the economy because you didn’t owe enough in taxes. Giving you money will not boost the economy at all.

and families with incomes below $40,000 would at most receive partial rebates.

How many of you make $3333 per month or less? The Bush boys think you are worth giving some money to, but certainly not the full tax break.

But a household with an income of $100,000 or more could get back $1,600

How many of you make $8333 or more per month? You get to add a little more money into your savings account because you likely have one already. You do not need to spend that money right away. That does not boost the economy.

If you are in this category, you likely agree with Bush on this because you want a tax break. However, it’s the economy that needs the boost. What is good for you is not necessarily what is good for the country during a recession.

For the purpose of jump-starting the economy, economists want people to spend extra money as quickly as possible.

By putting that money into the hands of workers who need it, you give them money that will be spent right away and the recession will go away. You will benefit a lot more with the economy doing better than you will with a one-time payment of $1600.

“The president again is focused on broad-based tax relief for those who are paying taxes,” said Treasury Secretary Henry M. Paulson Jr. when asked at a news conference on Friday whether “everybody” would get a tax break. “This is something that has worked well before, has worked in 2001, worked in 2003.”

Administration officials and Republican lawmakers say it only makes sense to give tax rebates to people who actually paid taxes.

“You have to be a taxpayer in order to get a tax rebate,” said Representative Paul D. Ryan, Republican of Wisconsin and a member of the House Ways and Means Committee. “The White House is very clear that this is for people who pay taxes.”

POOR PEOPLE PAY TAXES TOO! The federal income tax is not the only way we are taxed in this country. Poor people and most middle class people also spend almost if not all of their paycheck every single week.

By percentage and by total amount, poor people and the middle class, (the real middle class that makes less than $100,000 per year, not the bush definition of the middle class that makes $200,000+ per year) put more money into the economy than those that make much more money.

Those that make $100,000 per year or more stimulate the stock market, which according to them and the bush administration will eventually boost the economy. Trickle down economics means give a lot of money to rich people and corporations and some of it will eventually trickle down to the middle class and poor of this country, but it should always go to the rich first so they can decide how much of it to give the rest of us.

Robert Greenstein, director of the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, a research group in Washington, estimated that under the Republican plan, as many as 65 million Americans with low or modest incomes would miss out on part or all of the payments.

“This approach fails on two counts,” Mr. Greenstein said. “It omits or partly omits those who need the help. And it omits the tens of millions of people who are living paycheck to paycheck and who would be most likely to quickly spend every dollar they can get.”

bush tax cuts

20 January 2008

Political Correctness Outweighs Even Disease Control?

posted in: Main — namecritic @ 2:45 pm

I blog about political correctness all the time because it really does piss me off. It’s ok to try not to be outright offensive to people. Using racial slurs and such is wrong. We all agree on that.

However, people have gotten so sensitive or fearful that they might offend someone they are afraid to state facts or they put their facts into some kind of politically correct statement that fails to get the truth across.

Examples;

If I use the phrase “Illegal Aliens” some people will say that is racist. They want to call them “Undocumented Workers”.

Undocumented workers suggests that all illegal aliens in this country work and that their status is practically legal. A fact not in evidence.

Then we are supposed to believe that they only take jobs Americans will not do. Again not a factual statement. Americans will take $10 per hour construction jobs and recently a guy was found out as an illegal alien and was working as a police officer, another job American workers will do.

Wikipedia: Illegal immigration refers to immigration across national borders in a way that violates the immigration laws of the destination country. Under this definition, an illegal immigrant is a foreigner who either has illegally crossed an international political border, be it by land, sea, or air, or a foreigner who has entered a country legally but then overstays his/her Visa in order to live and/or work there.

If you fit into that sentence above, you are an ILLEGAL ALIEN. That is not a racial slur.

Yet, just discussing these facts by many people’s standards is racist. Truth doesn’t matter to the PC crowd.

If you live in a city where neighborhoods are still pretty much divided among racial lines and a report comes out that says crime is higher in a specific ethnic neighborhood, then there are those that will say you are a racist and you are purposely demeaning the people of a particular race.

It doesn’t matter that the report was absolutely factual. You just can’t say it because some group or another will call the report racist.

It’s no longer politically correct to tell the truth or put out any report, no matter if it is factual or not if it sheds a bad light on any particular group of people.

Like this story in the NYTimes

After Linking New Strain of Staph to Gay Men, University Scrambles to Clarify
By JESSE McKINLEY

On Monday, a team of researchers led by doctors from the University of California at San Francisco announced that gay men were “many times more likely than others” to acquire a new strain of drug-resistant staphylococcus, a nasty, fast-spreading and potential lethal bacteria known as MRSA USA300. And sure enough, the study, published online in the Annals of Internal Medicine, was quickly picked up by reporters round the world and across the Internet, including a London tabloid which dubbed the disease “the new H.I.V.”

But for gay men in the Castro neighborhood here, which was an early epicenter for the AIDS epidemic and a current hot spot for MRSA, the report also seemed to cast an unfair, and all too familiar, stigma on their sexuality.

“The way they keep targeting gays as if gays alone are responsible for it, its like H.I.V./AIDS all over again,” said Colin Thurlow, 60, who is gay and lives in San Francisco. “And we’re sick and tired of it.”

It doesn’t matter that the University was trying to warn gay men about the disease. It doesn’t matter that the report might be factual. it only matters that it might shed a bad light on gays. We can’t have that.

On Friday, it issued an apology, saying their release had “contained some information that could be interpreted as misleading.” “I think we were looking at this from a scientific point of view and not projecting any political impact,” he said. “We were focusing on the data.

Worse than the politically correct crowd are the apologists. If the report was not factual, apologize. But if the report was factual, then there is no need for an apology.

The report looked at nine San Francisco hospitals in 2004 and 2005. A separate part of the study, conducted at an AIDS clinic in the city from 2004 to 2006, found that gay men were 13 times more likely to be infected with MRSA USA300.

The report did not say, “only gays get this disease.” The report did not say “this disease started in the gay community.” The report did not say, “Gays are responsible for the spread of the disease”.

The report said that THEIR STUDY showed that gay men were more at risk from the disease. The report also said their study was limited in scope as far as the areas the study was conducted in. No one there meant to harm the gay community. They simply stated facts and should be able to do so without risking the anger of the politically correct crowd.

18 January 2008

Homeland Security and Border Patrol - Show Me The Money!

posted in: Main, Politics — namecritic @ 12:36 pm

This pisses me off. Bush and congress have approved billions of dollars for homeland security and supposedly to secure our borders. Bush wants to give amnesty to illegal immigrants or give them some other type of legal jargon bs that lets them stay here illegally.

I believe if you want to live in this country, you do it legally. You apply for citizenship. Many have and they get all the rights accorded to them as US Citizens.

But in order for the system to work, you have to put some of those billions of dollars to work on processing applications from those who do wish to apply for citizenship legally. By not doing so, you perpetuate the problem of illegal immigration.

Legal Immigrants Facing a Longer Wait
By JULIA PRESTON of the NYTimes

Because of an unprecedented surge in immigration applications last summer, legal immigrants will have to wait much longer during the next two years to receive visas or naturalization papers, the top official of the federal agency that issues those documents said Thursday.

Under questioning from subcommittee members, Mr. Gonzalez said he could not guarantee that immigrants who applied to become citizens last summer would be naturalized in time to vote in the November elections.

Hmm. I wonder, if the hispanic vote commits to one party or the other, will this change so these new citizens will be able to vote?

Put some of that money being used for everything from fences to new vests for dope sniffing dogs into processing these applications. I am against people coming into this country illegally. I am all for those applying for legal citizenship. Fix the system!

17 January 2008

What Does The US Government, The Bush Family, and The Saudis Have In Common?

posted in: Politics, War — namecritic @ 1:53 am

A lot of people call any allegation of ties between the Bush family and the Saudi Royal Family is just lies and conspiracy theories. I decided to look up some information on the topic.

In 1920, under a League of Nations mandate, officials from France and Great Britain carved up vast tracts of warlord-dominated territories in Arabia into what they imagined would be nation states devoid of the complex historical, cultural, and tribal realities of the Mideast.

Instead of establishing European-style nation states, the strongest warlords quickly entrenched themselves with the aid of standing armies and spy networks. In much of the Mideast, fealty is often accorded to tribal overlords and the Islamic sects they favor rather than to the territory and people within the boundaries of the nation state.

Jonathan Rabin succinctly defines the reality, past and present, of the desert sheikdoms: “The systems of government that have evolved in Syria, Iraq and Saudi Arabia are paranoid family dictatorships with ancestral roots in a single city or village.” –Jonathan Raban, “Western conceit of nation-building ignores culture and history of Arabia,”

– Seattle Times, November 24, 2002–

usama bin laden

Islamic fundamentalists like Osama bin Laden make their appeals to the nation or community of believers, not to any particular nation state, although the rich and powerful among the Muslims have founded Western-style businesses and formed corporations both inside and outside the boundaries of their native countries. Because Osama himself is a scion of a rich Saudi family with wide-ranging business interests throughout the world, the split Saudi personality is most evident in him and the bin Laden clan. Osama, who calls America “The Great Satan,” has done business with the infidel Americans whenever it suited him.

Throughout the eighties, when the United States assisted the Saudis in a giant military buildup of airfields, ports, and bases throughout the kingdom, many of the contracts were awarded to the largest construction company in Saudi Arabia, the Saudi Binladen Group, founded by Osama bin Laden’s father.

At the same time, the United States trained and armed troops in Afghanistan to fight the Soviets. The United States and Saudi Arabia spent about $40 billion on the war in Afghanistan, recruiting, supplying, and training nearly 100,000 radical mujahideen from forty Muslim countries, including Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Iran, Algeria, and Afghanistan itself. Among the recruits were Osama bin Laden and his followers.

–Michael Parenti, 9-11 Terrorism Trap: September 11 and Beyond (2000) City Lights Books, San Francisco–

With C.I.A. funding, Osama bin Laden imported engineers and equipment from his father’s Saudi construction company to build tunnels for guerrilla training centers and hospitals, and for arms dumps near the Pakistan border.

After the Soviets withdrew from Afghanistan, the C.I.A. and the Pakistani intelligence agency sponsored the Taliban organization, a government composed of the fanatic Wahhabi Islamic sect, the same sect that is the state religion in Saudi Arabia.

Although followers of the Wahhabi sect do not refer to themselves as Wahhabis, the label is useful because it applies to a single Muslim group with a set of beliefs peculiar to them alone: Wahhabis maintain that Shi’ites and Sufis are not Muslims, and that Muslims should not visit shrines or celebrate Mohammed’s birthday.

– Laura Secor, “Which Islam?,” Boston Daily Globe, December 15, 2002

The Saudi sheiks have been Wahhabis since they intermarried with the family of a puritanical Muslim scholar, Mohammed ibn Abd al-Wahhab, in 1774. Supported first by Britain and later by the United States, the Saudis captured the Muslim holy cities of Mecca and Medina, easily gaining control of the entire Arabian peninsula.

Wherever they ruled, the Wahhabis imposed their medieval code on their hapless subjects, making public spectacles of stoning adulterers to death and maiming thieves, destroying decorated mosques and cemeteries, prohibiting music, sequestering women, and promoting war on infidels.

The Saudi sheiks have lavished funds on anti-American and anti-Israeli terrorists-in-training while indoctrinating other Muslims through its worldwide network of religious schools, mosques, newspapers, and presses.

The Wahhabi Taliban in Afghanistan had the blessings of the Saudi royal family and of The Big Three–the bin Laden family, the al Ahmoudi family, and the Mahfouz family–the richest clans in that medieval kingdom. (Khalid bin Mahfouz is bin Laden’s brother-in-law, according to the C.I.A.). The desert oligarchs profited from world-wide investments as well as sleazy banking schemes such as the infamous Bank of Credit and Commerce International.

bush saudi kiss

Salem bin Laden, Osama’s brother, has conducted all his American affairs through James Bath, a Houston crony of the Bush family. Bath’s former business partner Bill White testified in court that Bath had been a liaison for the C.I.A.

In 1979 Bath invested $50,000 in Arbusto, George W. Bush’s first business venture. Rumor had it that Bath was acting as Salem bin Laden’s representative.

“In conflicting statements, Bush at first denied ever knowing Bath, then acknowledged his stake in Arbusto and that he was aware Bath represented Saudi interests.”

–Wayne Madsen, “Questionable Ties: Tracking bin Laden’s money flow leads back to Midland, Texas,”

In addition to doing aviation business with Saudi sheiks, Bath was part owner of a Houston bank whose chief stockholder was Ghaith Pharaon, who represented the Bank of Commerce and Credit International (BCCI), a criminal global bank with branches in 73 countries.

BCCI proceeded to defraud depositors of $10 billion during the ‘80s, while providing a money laundry conduit for the Medellin drug cartel, Asia’s major heroin cartel, Manuel Noriega, Saddam Hussein, the C.I.A., and Islamist terrorist organizations worldwide.

–”The Press on the BCCI-bin Mahfouz-bin Laden Intelligence Nexus, ” Boston Herald , December 11, 2001–

Big Three wheeler-dealer Khalid bin Mahfouz, one of the largest stockholders in the criminal bank, was indicted when the massive BCCI banking scandal blew apart in the early 1990s. The Saudi royal family placed him under house arrest after discovering that Mahfouz had used the royal bank to channel millions of dollars through fake charities into bin Laden’s organizations, but Mahfouz was not so much punished as inconvenienced.

–Jonathan Beaty & S. C. Gwynne, The Outlaw Bank: A Wild Ride Into the Secret Heart of BCCI, (1993) Random House, New York–

Just a little history. The Bush family has a pattern of doing business with unsavory people. GW Bush’s grandfather did business with Hitler before and during World War 2.

In 1989, bin Laden established al Qaeda (the Base) in Afghanistan to organize extremist Wahhabis and disperse their networks throughout the country. A year later, he returned to Saudi Arabia and founded a welfare agency for Arab-Afghan veterans.

Bin Laden hoped to mobilize the veterans as a kind of religious-military army, but King Faud discouraged the venture. When King Faud invited 540,000 American troops to the kingdom to fight in the Gulf War, bin Laden lambasted the royal family and urged religious authorities to issue fatwahs (religious rulings) condemning the American infidels.

In 1991, Osama bin Laden and a band of Afghan veterans agitated in Sudan for a holy war against the enemies of Islam. In 1992, he claimed responsibility for the attack on American soldiers in Yemen, and again for attacks in Somalia in 1993.

He was mum about the terrorist truck bombing of the World Trade Center in 1993, the explosion that killed six people and injured more than a thousand, but investigators knew bin Laden had donated heavily to the religious “charity” that financed the bombing operation.

In February 1995, when he was appointed chief of the F.B.I.’s counter-terrorism section in Washington, John O’Neill immediately assembled and coordinated a team to capture Ramzi Yousef, who was en route from Pakistan to Afghanistan. Yousef was strongly suspected of planning and directing the World Trade Center bombing in 1993.

In three days, the kingpin of the World Trade Center bombing was in custody, and O’Neill went on to accumulate damning evidence against the 1993 World Trade bombers that led to their conviction in American courts.

For the next six years, John O’Neill tirelessly investigated terrorist strikes against Americans and American interests in Saudi Arabia, East Africa, and Yemen, often encountering American officials’ roadblocks on the way.

Even in 1996, after Jamal Ahmed al-Fadl turned himself in at the American Embassy in Eritrea and divulged details of bin Laden’s and al Qaeda’s organization and operations, the State Department refused to list al Qaeda as a terrorist organization.

In February 1998, bin Laden assembled a number of terrorist groups, including Islamic Jihad, and issued a fierce fatwa calling for the deaths of all Americans.

On August 7, 1998, 226 people died in the simultaneous bombing of American embassies in Tanzania and Kenya. Investigators blamed bin Laden for the attacks.

On August 20, 1998, President Clinton amended Executive Order 12947 to add Osama bin Laden and his key associates to the list of terrorists, thus blocking their US assets–including property and bank accounts–and prohibiting all U.S. financial transactions with them. The United States conducted a missile attack against bin Laden’s facilities in Afghanistan.

On October 12, 2000, two suicide bombers ignited their boatload of explosives next to the USS Cole, an American destroyer refueling in Aden, off the coast of Yemen. The blast killed seventeen sailors and wounded thirty-nine others.

O’Neill and his crack investigating team were dispatched to Yemen and hit a stone wall. He had hoped satellite intercepts of phone calls between an al Qaeda operative in Aden and Osama bin Laden in Afghanistan would lead him to the mastermind of the Cole attack, but the American ambassador and the Yemeni officials blocked the investigation at every turn.

O’Neill resigned from the F.B.I. in July 2001 and signed on as security chief for the World Trade Center in September. He died in the WTC attack on September 11, 2001.

In Forbidden Truth: U.S.-Taliban Secret Oil Diplomacy and the Failed Hunt for bin Laden, two French intelligence analysts, Jean-Charles Brisard and Guillaume Dasquie, claim that the Clinton and Bush administrations impeded investigations of bin Laden and his al Qaeda terrorist group in order to maintain good relations with Saudi Arabia and to maintain the stability of the oil market.

“As the late John O’Neill told one of the authors [Brisard] of this book, ‘All of the answers, all of the clues allowing us to dismantle Osama bin Laden’s organization, can be found in Saudi Arabia.’”

–Jean-Charles Brisard and Guillaume Dasquie, Forbidden Truth: U.S.-Taliban Secret Oil Diplomacy and the Failed Hunt for bin Laden (2002) Thunder’s Mouth Press/Nation Books, New York–

In articles and interviews, Brisard has expanded on this statement, pronouncing the official story about bin Laden’s exile from his native Saudi Arabia in 1994 and his frozen assets to be a canard. Not only did O’Neill and the F.B.I. have extensive information concerning the finances of bin Laden and al Qaeda, but the business connections between the bin Ladens, the Mahfouzes, the al Ahmoudis, the Saudi royal family, and the Bush family kept turning up in their investigations.

Mahfouz, who owns Nimir Petroleum, has conducted joint ventures with the al Amoudi family, which owns Delta Oil. Delta Oil and Unocal planned to build a pipeline through Afghanistan before the Taliban backed away. These Saudi companies are still partnered with bigger oil companies (such as Texaco and Unocal) in developing Central Asian oil projects.

Although Brisard’s interpretation of events has been disputed, the documentation of Forbidden Truth is impeccable. Clearly, the finances and fortunes of the Saudi oligarchs and the Bush family have been intertwined for many years, and oil has been the lubricant of choice, even non-existent oil.

In The Conspirators, Al Martin describes an instance of the latter. He says that the Gulf Oil Drilling Supply, of New York, Miami, and Bahrain, was Jeb Bush’s favorite artifice for oil and gas frauds:

“The fraud was rather simple. Richard Secord arranged through then Vice President George Bush Sr.’s old friend, Ghaith Pharaon, the then retired head of Saudi intelligence, for Gulf Oil and Drilling to purchase from the Saudi government oil and gas leases in the Gulf which were effectively worthless.”

The leases would be embellished to appear extremely valuable and then used as loan collateral. Great American Bank and Trust of West Palm Beach subsequently failed under the weight of unpaid Iran-Contra loans.

“Also, in the case of Gulf Oil Drilling Supply, there was some moderately large international lending to that company. As you would suspect, it was principally out of the old George Bush friendly banks–Credit Lyonnais and Banque Paribas, which, combined lent $60 million dollars to Gulf Oil Drilling Supply, which, of course, was defaulted on later.”

–Al Martin, The Conspirators: Secrets of an Iran-Contra Insider (2002) National Liberty Press, LLC–

Michael Springmann, formerly chief of the visa section at the US Embassy in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, claims that he rejected hundreds of suspicious visa applications, but the C.I.A. officer overruled him and ordered the visas to be issued. Springmann protested to the State Department, the Office of Diplomatic Security, the F.B.I., the Justice Department and congressional committees, but in vain.

Center for Cooperative Research,

Springmann observed that 15 of the 19 people who allegedly flew airplanes into buildings in the United States got their visas from the same CIA-dominated consulate in Jeddah. As a special favor to residents of Saudi Arabia (including non-Saudi citizens), applicants for non-immigrant visas can apply at private travel agencies and receive their visa through the mail.

During the months following the 9-11 attack, 102 applicants received their visas by mail, 2 more were interviewed, and none were rejected.

durban wamy

The Saudis always got special treatment. In a November 6, 2001 BBC broadcast Greg Palast revealed just how special that treatment was.

Even after Pakistan expelled the World Association of Muslim Youth (WAMY) and India claimed that the organization was linked to terrorist bombings in Kashmir and the Philippines military accused WAMY of funding Muslim insurgency, the F.B.I. got orders to leave the “charitable association” alone.

After 9/11, investigators of the Islamic charities discovered overwhelming evidence that Saudis at all levels worked in tandem with the terrorists.

David Kaplin reports, “At the Saudi High Commission in Bosnia, which coordinated local aid among Saudi charities, police found before-and-after photos of the World Trade Center, files on pesticides and crop dusters, and information on how to counterfeit State Department badges.

At Manila’s international airport, authorities stopped Agus Dwikarna, an al Haramain representative based in Indonesia. In his suitcase were C4 explosives.”

The interlocking charities make it difficult to follow the money trail. “Many share directors, office space, and cash flow. For two years, investigators have followed the money to offshore trusts and obscure charities which, according to court records, they believe are tied to Hamas, al Qaeda, and other terrorist groups.”

– (US News and World Report, December 15, 2003). –US News and World Report, December 15, 2003–

The White House official line is that the Bin Ladens are above suspicion –apart from Osama, the black sheep, who they say hijacked the family name. That’s fortunate for the Bush family and the Saudi royal household, whose links with the Bin Ladens could otherwise prove embarrassing.

But Newsnight has obtained evidence that the FBI was on the trail of other members of the Bin Laden family for links to terrorist organisations before and after September 11th.”

–Greg Palast and David Pallister, “FBI and US Spy Agents Say Bush Spiked Bin Laden Probes Before 11 September,” The Guardian, November 7, 2001–

In the Boston Globe, March 11, 20004, Carl Unger, author of House of Bush, House of Saud: The Secret Relationship Between the World’s Two Most Powerful Dynasties, states that the 9/11 commission should ask who authorized the evacuation of 140 Saudi nationals on at least 8 aircraft making stops in 12 cities immediately following the attacks.

“Many of the passengers were high-ranking members of the royal House of Saud. About 24 of them were members of the bin Laden family, which owned the Saudi Binladin Group, a multibillion-dollar construction conglomerate.” Unger obtained passenger lists for 4 of the flights, which are posted on his website: www.houseofbush.com and includes the name of Prince Ahmed bin Salman.

“As reported last year by Gerald Posner in ‘Why America Slept,‘ Prince Ahmed not only had alleged ties to Al Qaeda, but may also have known in advance that there would be attacks on 9/11.

According to Posner, Abu Zubaydah, an Al Qaeda operative who was part of Osama bin Laden’s inner circle and was captured in 2002, made these assertions when he was interrogated by the CIA. The commission should ask Mueller about Zubaydah’s interrogation. They should also ask whether the FBI interrogated Prince Ahmed before his departure.

“But Prince Ahmed will never be able to answer any questions because not long after the CIA interrogation, he died of a heart attack at the age of 43. Yet we do know that he was on one of the flights.”

Unger believes that this episode “raises particularly sensitive questions for the administration. Never before in history has a president of the United States had such a close relationship with another foreign power as President Bush and his father have had with the Saudi royal family, the House of Saud.

I have traced more than $1.4 billion in investments and contracts that went from the House of Saud over the past 20 years to companies in which the Bushes and their allies have had prominent positions — Harken Energy, Halliburton, and the Carlyle Group among them.

Is it possible that President Bush himself played a role in authorizing the evacuation of the Saudis after 9/11? What did he know and when did he know it?”

Article on unasked questions for the 911 commission

In October 2001, the Treasury Department identified the Muwafaq Foundation, largely endowed by Khalid bin Mahfouz, as an al Qaeda front that had funneled millions of dollars to bin Laden. Some families of the 9/11 victims have named Mahfouz and dozens of prominent Saudis, including members of the royal family, in a lawsuit that accuses the Saudis of funding the 9/11 terrorists.

Bush administration officials stated that they would seek to have the suit dismissed or delayed. –Jeff Gerth and Judith Miller, “Saudis Called Slow to Help Stem Terror Finances,” New York Times, November 28, 2002 –

Senators Bob Graham and Richard C. Shelby, leaders of the congressional panel ending an investigation of the 9/11 attacks, said the administration should declassify information concerning Saudi funding of terrorists.

“Citing ‘their people and a lot of their leaders and probably even the royal family,’ Shelby said: ‘I believe [the Saudis] cannot support so-called charities that support terrorism on a big scale, and then pretend that they’re our friends or our allies.

“‘As we get into the money trail, it might be embarrassing, but the American people need to know; the victims and their families need to know,’ he added. Shelby and Graham said avoiding embarrassment and maintaining good relations with Saudi Arabia are not legitimate reasons to withhold information from the public.

“‘The question is,’ Graham said after the news conference, ‘will we get [the information declassified] in 30 years when the archives are open, or will we get it in time, before the next attack?’” –Dana Priest and Susan Schmidt, “9/11 Panel Criticizes Secrecy on Saudi Links,” Washington Post, December 12 2002 –

Doubtless one of the connections the senators referred to was the Princess Haifa, the wife of Prince Bandar, Saudi ambassador to the United States for the last twenty years, the longest serving ambassador in Washington.

Princess Haifa had been making monthly transfers, $130,000 in all, from her Washington bank account to a needy woman who relayed some of the checks to her husband and another man who assisted and funded the two hijackers who were based in San Diego. –Greg Miller, Greg Krikorian and H.G. Reza, “FBI Looks at Saudi’s Links to 9/11,” Los Angeles Times, November 23, 2002 –

“The money moved into the family’s bank account beginning in early 2000, just a few months after hijackers Khalid Almidhar and Nawaf Alhazmi arrived in Los Angeles from an Al Qaeda planning summit in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, according to the sources.

Within days of the terrorists’ arrival in the United States, Al Bayoumi befriended the two men who would eventually hijack American Flight 77, throwing them a welcoming party in San Diego and guaranteeing their lease on an apartment next door to his own.

Al Bayoumi also paid $1,500 to cover the first two months of rent for Al Midhar and Alhazmi, although officials said it is possible that the hijackers later repaid the money.” –Michael Isikoff, Newsweek, November 22, 2002–

Prince Bandar and Princess Haifa professed their ignorance of the whole affair.

Mark Stein speculates about the recent visit Prince Bandar and Princess Haifa paid to George and Laura at the Crawford ranch, where they were received with the accolades usually reserved for heads of state. Bush must have known about the money transfers and Bandar must have known Bush knew, but apparently a good time was had by all.


I know. It’s all coincidence right?

“Meanwhile, Majeda Ibrahin, the woman the princess was sending all that money to, turns out to be married to Osama Basnan, another buddy of the al-Qa’eda duo, and one who subsequently celebrated 11 September as a ‘wonderful, glorious day’.

But here’s an odd little thing: Mr Basnan is known to have been in Texas in April when Crown Prince Abdullah and his entourage flew in to the state to see Bush at the ranch. Just another coincidence?

Well, sorta: he’s supposed to have had a meeting in Houston with some big-time Saudi prince who deals with ‘intelligence matters.’ This seems an unusual degree of access for some schlub from San Diego who’s in the US illegally, as it transpires.

He is variously described as a Saudi government agent and al-Qa’eda sympathiser, as if these positions are mutually exclusive. The Saudi embassy say they’ve only received queries about this matter from the media, not from the FBI.

Odd that. The federal government claims it needs vast new powers to track every single credit-card transaction and every single email of every single American, yet a prima facie link between the terrorists and Prince Bandar’s wife isn’t worth going over to the embassy to have a little chat about.” –Mark Steyn, “Bush and the Saudi Princess” –

Apparently it is not only the Saudis’ oil riches that insulates them from criticism, but also their calculated distribution of largesse. The Saudis have contributed to every presidential library in recent decades.

Not surprisingly, former ambassadors to Saudi Arabia from the United States end up being apologists for the corrupt, despotic Saudi regime. The Saudis have arranged that American ambassadors to their country not speak Arabic. The American embassy in Saudi Arabia gets all its information about the reactionary regime from the rulers.

Some of the Washington politicians who found the Saudi connection lucrative include Spiro Agnew, Frank Carlucci, Jimmy Carter, Clark Clifford, John Connally, James Baker, George H. W. Bush, William Simon and Caspar Weinberger. –Daniel Golden, James Bandler and Marcus Walker, Wall Street Journal, September 27, 2001 Posted at globalresearch.ca 5 October 2001 –

bush family

THE BUSH DYNASTY

The Bush dynasty has always been comfortable putting profits before patriotism. Prescott Bush, Bush Senior’s father, extended credit to Adolph Hitler and supplied him with raw materials during Word War II. The U. S. seized his assets under the Trading with the Enemy Act, but grandfather Bush found other ways to replenish the family coffers.

Bush Senior struck it rich in oil and in the defense industry. Mahfouz (yes, that Mahfouz), Prince Bandar and Prince Sultan (Bandar’s father) were also heavily invested in the defense industry through their holdings in the Carlyle Group, where Bush Senior served on the board of directors.

Founded in 1987 as a private investment group with strong connections to the Republican Party establishment, Carlyle increased its original investment of $130 million to $900 million when it went public in 2001.

“In recent years, Carlyle has been successful both at raising and making money. It has raised $14 billion in the last five years or so, and its annual rate of return has been 36 percent. Its 550 investors consist of institutions and wealthy individuals from around the world including, until shortly after September 2001, members of the bin Laden family of Saudi Arabia.

The family — which has publicly disavowed links with Osama bin Laden — had been an investor since 1995.” –James Hatfield, “Why would Osama bin Laden want to kill Dubya, his former business partner?” Online Journal, July 13, 2001–

“As the eleventh largest US defence contractor, Carlyle is involved in nearly every aspect of military production, including making the big guns used on US naval destroyers, the Bradley Fighting Vehicle used by US forces during the Gulf War and parts used in most commercial and military aircraft.

United Defense has joint ventures in Saudi Arabia and Turkey, two of the United States’ closest military allies in the Middle East.” –Steve Lohr, “Gerstner to Be Chairman of Carlyle Group,” New York Times, November 22, 2002–

It’s passing strange that even as the hijacked planes smashed into the World Trade Center, the Carlyle Group was holding its annual investor conference. Shafig Bin Laden, brother of Osama Bin Laden, attended.

Bush Junior once served as an executive with Caterair, one of hundreds of companies Carlyle has bought and sold over the past 15 years, but he removed the record of this period from his resume.

In 1986, Bush Junior, to date a flop as a businessman, joined Harken Energy Corporation as a director and was awarded 212,000 shares of stock and other plums.

In 1987, Khalid bin Mahfouz arranged for BCCI investor Abdullah Bakhsh to purchase 17% of Harken.

A Harken official acknowledged that Bush’s White House connections had everything to do with the appointment.

Somehow, the inexperienced, obscure firm was awarded a prime drilling contract by Bahrain, and Harken’s stock price soared.

In June 1990, Bush Junior sold his Harken stock for a juicy $848,000, enabling him to pay off the loan he had assumed on buying shares in the Texas Rangers. Never mind that the Harken stock promptly tanked when Saddam Hussein invaded Kuwait, for Abdullah Bakhsh, a major Harken shareholder and an investor in BCCI, who had purchased 17% of Harken Energy in 1987, got his money’s worth.

By 1990, Bakhsh’s representative on Harken’s board, Talet Othman, began attending Middle East policy discussions with President Bush Senior.

Now that Bush Junior occupies the White House, Bush Senior receives frequent CIA briefings (his prerogative as a former president). “In July 2001, Bush personally contacted Saudi Crown Prince Abdullah to ‘clarify’ his son’s Middle East policies.

Also during the summer of 2001, Bush forwarded his son a North Korea policy plan penned by ‘Asia expert’ and former ambassador to Korea, Donald Gregg. Gregg is a 31-year CIA veteran and the elder Bush’s former national security adviser whose expertise involved participation in the Vietnam-era Phoenix Program (death squads), Air America heroin smuggling, ‘pacification’ efforts in El Salvador and Guatemala, the ‘October Surprise,’ and the Iran-Contra operation (for which Gregg received a Bush pardon in 1992). –” Tim Shorrock uncovers the Bush connection to US defence giant the Carlyle Group, New Internationalist 347, July 2002–

Bush Junior has received more than advice from his father. He has taken on the team of hustlers and criminals that worked with George Herbert Walker Bush when he was Vice President and President of the United States of America.

Just as his father did, he invokes executive privilege to hide all evidence of collusion with the petroleum pashas who have enriched the Bushes and intimidated the rest of us.

Sandy Tolan, an I.F. Stone Fellow at the Graduate School of Journalism at UC Berkeley, asserts that what the Bush administration really wants in Iraq is a remapping of the Mideast.

“The plan is, in its way, as ambitious as the 1916 Sykes-Picot agreement between the empires of Britain and France, which carved up the region at the fall of the Ottoman Empire. The neo-imperial vision, which can be ascertained from the writings of key administration figures and their co-visionaries in influential conservative think tanks, includes not only regime change in Iraq but control of Iraqi oil, a possible end to the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries and newly compliant governments in Syria and Iran — either by force or internal rebellion.”

The Bushes are carriers of the deny-destroy-and-be-damned virus. Prescott Bush never apologized for trading with the Nazis. George Bush Senior professed to know nothing of the drug and arms dealing that funded the bloody, illegal Iran-Contra operations, although it was common knowledge that he directed them.

He and his sons enriched themselves through shady real estate deals and financial manipulations that brought down entire banking and savings and loan institutions. They are all consummate inside traders, looting and leaving ruin in their wake.

President-Select George Bush has no scruples about exploiting his office for personal and family gain. The Texas governor who could joke about frying prisoners in the electric chair will not, as president, agonize over the decision to send young men and women into battle–or over denying them medical care when they return home injured.

There is irrefutable evidence that highly-placed Saudis aided and supported the terrorists who murdered thousands of American citizens on September 11, 2001. Yet George Bush persists in protecting and colluding with those who sponsor terrorists. Is this not an an act of treason?

And some of you actually still believe that GW Bush is looking out after our best interests?

Are all of these sources lying?

They just invented a conspiracy?

How long can people believe these things aren’t true about our beloved president?

It’s not your right to question your government, it’s your duty to do so. –Thomas Jefferson–

Was he lying too?

16 January 2008

War, Foriegn Policy, and the Constitution

posted in: Consumer Protection, Main, Politics, Religion, War — namecritic @ 9:37 pm

comment »
 

Quote of the Day

As long as you eat in time
You will never go hungry

McMike - 1999



News and Media Blog  Who Let The Blog Out?

Powered by mijzelf !! en MainCore