Just Some Facts About The Bush Family, The Iraq War, Cheney, and more
Bush family has been in the oil and energy business since the 50s.
Cheney in the oil construction business.
Texaco named a tanker after Condeleeza Rice.
The bush family has the same oil business interests as the saudi royal family.
Gas prices are higher than ever before.
We are attacking an oil producing country that would not do business with the bush family interests or the saudi companies.
Cheney as secretary of defense under reagan gave billions of no-bid contracts to haliburton.
Cheney became ceo of haliburton receiving millions of dollars in compensation.
Cheney as VP under bush, haliburton gets billions in no-bid contracts.
15 of 19 hijackers were saudis.
The saudi royal family gave money to the 911 hijackers.
Bush refused to allow investigation of saudis in relation to 911.
Sept. 12th no americans allowed to fly, but saudi families including the bin laden family allowed to fly that day.
One of Bush’s former cabinet members reveals that Bush planned to invade Iraq in February of 2001, months before 911.
Bush refers to 911 when talking about the Iraq war as if it were not planned before then and as if the two were related even though he has admitted there is no direct link between 911 and Iraq.
Afganistan had the Taliban and Osama Bin Laden and Al Queda. Bin Laden was directly tied to the attacks on 911.
Afganistan has a much larger population than Iraq.
We spend about 10% of the funds approved for the war on terrorism in Afghanistan and 90% of them in Iraq.
There were no WMDs in Iraq.
Can you really take all that together and tell me nothing is wrong here? Can you really believe that the war in Iraq is about Terrorism? Can you read this and tell me Bush is doing what is best for our country? Can you really beieve the Saudis had nothing to do with 911? Can you really believe that Bush’s primary goal is going after the terrorists that toppled the twin towers on 911?
This is not a conspiracy theory. The above are facts. I simply stated them all together in the same place to see if you can still convince yourself we should support bush and his war on Iraq. And if you can still support the war with Iraq, can you still convince yourself that it has ANYTHING AT ALL to do with 911 and that it has NOTHING to do with oil company profits?
Stumble it!
Please don’t use the word “FACTS” in describing your posting. You print hearsay, and conjectures without FACTS. Just because George Bush and Dick Cheney were involved (still are, according to your FACTS) in the oil busines, your leap to the US AND their allies attacking Iraq because of controlling oil prices is absurd, at the very least. George Bush unilaterally put on a uniform and gathered the forces of many nations and said “let ME lead you to my private war”. LOL over and over. No conspiracy theory, you say? You aren’t looking at your slanted presentation, under the guise of FACTS. Then you say that nobody could fly on 9-12, EXCEPT the royal Saudi family members. That has been explained over and over. It was for their own protection to try to prevent further attacks. That is one side of the story, and you choose to listen to the other side, and say “This is no conspiracy theory, but FACTS” Then you say, “There were no WMD found in Iraq”. That also is questionable as large vans moved out of Iraq after our invasion. Some of these contained large sums of currency, and others (COULD HAVE, not FACT), contained WMD or parts of them. These trucks headed for Syria. How many got through. I have also read articles by weapons inspectors who were with the UN and had weapons material in the UN building here in the US. I don’t claim FACTS, as you do, however; the democrats, loyal Patriots, and the liberal press don’t want to even know about any other information and they surely won’t report on it. Why don’t you call to task the prior administration. Under HIS administration the US and its facilities and vessels were attacked, several times. Direct attack that constituted action by any national caring president. This administration also had the chance to capture Bin Laden. This president stated that Hussein was a world threat and should be remove, forceably if necessary. Was it done by that administration? NO! However, president Bush is blamed solely, for all of this mess, and he did it successfully for his own desires to control oil prices for himself and his rotten co-horts. LOL! over and over. Bin Laden was featured on the cover of one of the major weekly news magazines in 2002 and stated that operations in some countries would have to be set aside so that resources could be utilized in IRAQ!! I read the article, was it FACTual? I don’t know. However, every major democratic (leader?) including Patriot John Kerry, was going around proclaiming that Saddam Hussein must be handled, that he was an immediate threat, and that whether there were WMD in Iraq, was not the issue. However; when “low life, worthless, stupid” George Bush takes a stand “AFTER direct attact” on 9/11, the whole congress voted to take action. Until conveniently the mid-term elections, and the presidential elections. OH, then, we never, never, wanted the Iraq issue, and we never never voted for MR. Bush’s WAR. Is Iraq political? You Betcha!!!! However; President Bush has held, steadfast, and guess what? The terrorist fighters in IRAQ, come from all over, many countries sending in potential “martyrs”, to retain a position in the Middle East. A critical position area, and the terrorists know this. Isn’t is amazing how our army and others have rebuilt the infrastructes of Iraq. Utilities, roads, schools (with freedom for kids and girls). Women set up in businesses. And now, guess what, I hear, probably falsely, of course, that the citizens of Iraq are fed up with the terrorists living next door and terrorizing the communities. They are taking a stand. But, of course, let’s deny all of this, and let us even attack the US General that reported on all of this and brand him a liar and a distorter of FACTS, oh my, and let’s even label him a Traitor. Why he is only a BUSH dupe. You haven’t convinced me yet, Loyal Patriot of FACTS!!! Truth: you don’t want anything but twisted, hateful, narrow viewed Bush bashing material.
My opinion: We should back Saudi Arabia against their greasy, petroleum wall, and demand, and follow through with a change over there. Guess what? It is coming, The Saudi royal family are scared to death. If Iraq becomes a type of democracy, Saudi Arabia, and Eqypt are next. Hopesone Ben
Comment by Hopesone Ben — January 13, 2008 @ 5:46 pm
You attribute things to me that I have never said. But of course you consider me as part of a “group” that you do not like and you believe that I believe everything that “group” says or does.
You say I do not use facts, then you add things and attribute them to me as if I said them. Now who is stretching the truth?
You said - “Just because George Bush and Dick Cheney were involved (still are, according to your FACTS) in the oil busines, your leap to the US AND their allies attacking Iraq because of controlling oil prices is absurd, at the very least.”
Them being in the oil business is only according to MY facts? So they were and are not in the oil business? Are you disputing the fact or do you just not like the fact being said?
you said - “Then you say that nobody could fly on 9-12, EXCEPT the royal Saudi family members. That has been explained over and over. It was for their own protection to try to prevent further attacks.”
Again, when I said that the saudi royals were allowed to fly on 911 and US citizens were not is still a fact. As you said we have heard the explanation. I saw no need to elaborate. But again, you do not dispute the fact. You don’t like the fact being said.
You quoted me saying “There were no WMD found in Iraq”. I stand by that fact. It is fact. You don’t like that fact, but you have yet to offer evidence disproving this fact.
You ask - “Why don’t you call to task the prior administration.” I did . . . when they were actually in office and could affect policy. Since they are not and they have no power to do anything, since they are a PRIOR administration, they are irrelevant to the current situation. I talk about the people that can actually change policy and that is the current administration WHOEVER that might be.
Everytime anyone says something bad about bush, his supporters say well, bill did this or bill did that. It’s like little children being caught doing sdmething wrong and saying, “Well billy did it too!”
You added “But, of course, let’s deny all of this, and let us even attack the US General that reported on all of this and brand him a liar and a distorter of FACTS, oh my, and let’s even label him a Traitor.” as if attributing this to me.
I never once called general Patreaus anything like a traitor or denounced his report in any way shape or form. Yet you don’t care that I never said that, you would rather create your own facts about what I said or did not say. And you say don’t call what I write as fact?
I do my best to bring you facts from reliable sources to back up what I have to say. My blog is my opinion and I never tell anyone any different. It is my blog. I own it. This is a free country even if you do not like that fact as well. I can write my opinion here even if you do not like my opinion.
I respect your opinion enough to leave your comments on my blog whiole you accuse me of lying and do namecalling to prove your point.
If I go to redstate.org, a republican blog, and state any opinion that is not pro bush, they will delete my comments and ban me from that website.
That is the republican extreme right wing mentality. Everyone must agree or shut up about it. Everyone who does not agree must be an idiot because we are right and everyone else is always wrong.
Bush said it best, “You are either with us or against us.” This mentality brought Hitler to power. That is also a fact. you do not have to like it.
You do not have to like anything I have to say. But at least talk about what I do say instead of making stuff up as you did in your comment. I never called general patreaus names or said he was a tritor yet you try to make it seem like I did.
That makes you the liar here. You did not dispute one fact I posted. You simply didn’t like the facts so you would like them changed. Typical.
Comment by namecritic — January 13, 2008 @ 7:37 pm