Things That Just Piss Me Off

What Pisses You Off?   

8 December 2007

Bad Behavior Plugin For Blogs Behaves Badly

posted in: Consumer Protection, Internet — Chris McElroy aka NameCritic @ 2:07 pm

Every now and then another blacklist appears that claims it has the solution to the spam problem on the web. They never have a real solution and end up blocking legitimate users from accessing websites, doing email, etc.

The latest encounter I had with one is called bad behavior. This one even regularly locks the administrators of the blog out of their own blog. They have to rename the plugins folder just so they can get back in and they own the blog. So how can anyone expect it not to block legitimate users?

Bad behavior is really useless as with the case of most blacklists and related software. Seriously, the first time i visit a blog and get blocked, you expect I will bother to email the blogger? Nope. With millions of blogs that don’t block me I have plenty to read.

So all of you who have that claim bad behavior has cause a reduced load on your server, you might want to think that the reduced load is because of less readers and visitors to your blog.

Akismet deletes the spam just fine. I run about 50 blogs through my company. The extra “load” is not a real burden only an imagined one.

Here are some of the comments from the bad behavior blog;

I’m the admin of my blog and Bad Behavior is blocking me to get into the admin zone.

oops!

Yep, same here. My site was working fine, then a registered user told me they couldn’t get in. Went to check it out and the plugin won’t let me log in as admin!

uh oh

Same here. As soon as I am able to log into my blog that you’ve locked me out of, I’m going to remove this plugin, throw it on the floor and stomp on it.

That one was funny.

there is no reason in the world why a spam plugin should be allowed to override a top level administrative login, I would very strongly recommend against the use of this plugin to anyone who is considering it.

Me too.

Gotta say, great plugin, it works like a charm reducing load on my server.

Someone likes it! it’s reducing that huge load on his server.

same here, when activated BB i cannot browse my own sites. Also, i notice the same behaviour on www.teachmejoomla.net and www.dutchjoomla.org when using my regular desktop PC. (No matter if if use IE 7 or Firefox), When using another (linux) PC (behind the same router, firewall / ip) with Firefox i can visit the mentioned websites with no problem.
Have contacted the admins of the mentioned websites but they bounce the problem back : I have to check on viruses, spyware etc. or remove all firewall, anti-spyware software all together in order to access their websites ?!?!?!? What kind of advice is that. BTW : ie checked my desktop PC with various ant-virus/antispyware software with no result at all. When i suggest the admins to check their own configuration they reply a bit annoyed. All in all : i believe the BB plugin is a good concept but needs a serious bugfix. Untill then i stay away from www.teachmejoomla.net and www.dutchjoomla.org.

That last one sums it up. Users will stay away from a blog where they have problems accessing things. Go figure.

But for those of you wishing to defend bad behavior, which is more of a description of the plugin than a name, you can go get your own copy here and block your visitors from reading your blog too. If you are lucky it will block you out of your blog too.


7 December 2007

Turning Football Into Pay-Per-View

posted in: Consumer Protection — Chris McElroy aka NameCritic @ 6:59 pm

This is really stupid. Many fans, including me, stopped watching baseball because of the strikes and other issues. Business is down for baseball. Not as good as it was for them. All because of greed. Now the NFL and the cable companies want to do the same thing to football. They are going to let greed ruin the game.

Anyone who has watched a football game on TV knows they have no trouble selling enough ads to pay for it. We get to watch football. The networks and the NFL get to make money, the advertisers get to sell their products to a large audience, the teams make money and so do the players. Everyone is a winner here.

There is no need for the best games to be taken away and put on pay-per-view which is not even available to a lot of people. Not everyone has cable and not everyone can afford to pay for these games.

Recently the cable companies held the Dallas VS Green Bay game hostage. Now they plan to take New England’s 16th game hostage. It might end up that the patriots are still undefeated after 15 games and fans will want to see history made.

The cable companies want you to pay for that. And even many people in Massachusetts do not have cable so will not be able to watch the game even if they wanted to pay.

Dear Commissioner Goodell and President McSlarrow,
I am writing to express my concern on behalf of football fans across the country who find themselves caught in the middle of a corporate standoff. While the National Football League and a few major cable companies continue to blame each other for the current state of NFL Network carriage, too many American football fans are being held hostage.

Unfortunately, this disagreement has led to the use of what could potentially be an historic football game as leverage in a negotiation. On Saturday, December 29th, the New England Patriots will play the New York Giants in a game that could determine whether the Patriots become the first NFL team in 35 years to finish the regular season with an undefeated record. Unfortunately, millions of fans outside of the local media markets - including fans living in Massachusetts and New York - will not have access to the network that will broadcast the game.

I recognize that the games shown on the NFL Network have been the long-standing subject of commercial negotiations. I do not wish to interfere with these negotiations, and I hope that the two sides can come to an agreement that will ensure that NFL games will be broadcast to the maximum number of television households across the country. In light of the unique circumstances surrounding the 2007 New England Patriots, I urge you to reach an agreement as soon as possible, so that football fans across the country are not prevented from viewing what could be an historic sporting event.

I thank you for your consideration.

Sincerely,
John F. Kerry

Now whether you like John Kerry or not, he is absolutely right on this issue. I didn’t know he was a big fan, but he does know that a lot of people are pissed off about this.

People in the New England Patriots home state will not be allowed the chance to watch their team in what might be a historic game because the cable companies are greedy jerks.

Text size – + Kerry presses on NFL Network
Email|Link|Comments (39) By Mike Reiss, Globe Staff December 6, 07 07:04 PM
Massachusetts senator John Kerry sent a letter to National Football League Commissioner Roger Goodell and President and CEO of National Cable & Telecommunications Association Kyle McSlarrow today, asking them to break the deadlock in negotiations between the NFL and several major cable companies over how football games on the NFL network are broadcast.

This has been a hot topic among Patriots fans, who have expressed concern that they won’t be able to see the season finale against the Giants, which is scheduled to be broadcast on the NFL Network.

The text of the letter:

Dear Commissioner Goodell and President McSlarrow,
I am writing to express my concern on behalf of football fans across the country who find themselves caught in the middle of a corporate standoff. While the National Football League and a few major cable companies continue to blame each other for the current state of NFL Network carriage, too many American football fans are being held hostage.

Unfortunately, this disagreement has led to the use of what could potentially be an historic football game as leverage in a negotiation. On Saturday, December 29th, the New England Patriots will play the New York Giants in a game that could determine whether the Patriots become the first NFL team in 35 years to finish the regular season with an undefeated record. Unfortunately, millions of fans outside of the local media markets - including fans living in Massachusetts and New York - will not have access to the network that will broadcast the game.

I recognize that the games shown on the NFL Network have been the long-standing subject of commercial negotiations. I do not wish to interfere with these negotiations, and I hope that the two sides can come to an agreement that will ensure that NFL games will be broadcast to the maximum number of television households across the country. In light of the unique circumstances surrounding the 2007 New England Patriots, I urge you to reach an agreement as soon as possible, so that football fans across the country are not prevented from viewing what could be an historic sporting event.

I thank you for your consideration.

Sincerely,
John F. Kerry

NFL RESPONSE

The following is the NFL’s response, from spokesman Greg Aiello, to the letter written by Massachusetts senator John Kerry:

“Commissioner Goodell welcomes the senator’s comments because we, too, want broad cable distribution for NFL Network. We agree that the big cable companies should sit down and negotiate with us for distribution comparable to their own channels.

“All fans should be able to see the NFL Network like they are able to see the Golf Channel on Comcast and Major League Baseball on TBS. Comcast has an agreement in place with us right now that would enable it to put the NFL Network into 25 million homes. Instead, Comcast delivers NFL Network to only one million homes on a pay-extra basis. Comcast can change that now without any further negotiation. As to Time Warner and other companies, we are eager to negotiate immediately with all the major cable companies to make NFL Network widely available.”

By law, cable companies get to have monopolies in certain areas. So if we were to boycott them, we would have no cable TV and they know that. They are using that law to hold people hostage.

At the same time, the NFL is pressuring the cable companies to carry their network. SO the NFL won’t budge and the cable companies won’t budge. So it’s the fans who lose, just like in the baseball strikes. The players wouldn’t budge and the owners wouldn’t budge and the fans lost.

Then we can turn that phrase around. They lost fans. You’d think the NFL would learn from that.

I’d really like to hear suggestions about what football fans can do about this. If we leave it to John Kerry, we will lose by a narrow margin.


1 December 2007

Spammers And Scammers And Those Who Love Them

posted in: Consumer Protection, Internet — Chris McElroy aka NameCritic @ 10:49 am

Ok, I know that spam pisses a lot of people off, but they are not the only ones to blame. Those who open spam email and buy things or click links are responsible for the amount of spam we get each day. If these spammers, phishers, and scammers were not getting click thrus and sales then they would not be doing it.

You are paying TOO much for your AdWords Campaign!

Why? Because Google have changed the rules on Adwords and now most Adword campaigns are paying up to 40% more than they should!

Now it is vital to review your AdWords campaign in the light of the new changes. You will be amazed at how much you can save. And over the course of the year this can save you thousands.

What are the new changes?
They are all about content and relevancy. Also is has to do with the source code and content on the web site itself! Without adapting to these new rules you will be paying the maximum monthly fee.

As specialists with AdWords and with years of experience we offer to examine your campaign and web site and to tell you what needs to be done to improve its performance and reduce costs.

This is at no obligation to you and you can see for yourself how much can be saved.

For more information
Call our Google AdWords Hotline
Freephone 0800 011 2047
International 0044 800 011 2047
or press here to send to us an email

Call Us Now! There is nothing to lose!

Rockwell Data corp
The AdWord Specialists

Required notice: This email has been sent directly to you as a UK business to business communication in full accordance with Internet
law. If you have acquired this in error please accept our apologies.

Notice that they try to make it look like they are associated with google at first to get you to continue reading past the first paragraph.

Then they tell you they are adwords specialists with years of experience. They are what they say they are because they say so dammit. You should believe them without any need for proof. Everyone who says they are an expert obviously is one right?

Then they name their company rockwell. Rockwell is a recognized name. But in art and software, not in google adwords management. But people will say, OH I”VE HEARD OF THEM! THEREFORE THIS EMAIL IS FROM A LEGITIMATE COMPANY!

Then you have to love the last part. This email is sent out in accordance with law, yada yada yada. No it isn’t. It’s spam. They know it. They just want you to think it isn’t spam so hopefully you won’t report their illegal activity.

If you are clicking on these types of emails, then you are to blame for the rest of us getting a ton of spam in our email every day. Yes you. You know who you are. it’s time to stop blaming the spammers and start educating the stupid people that click the links.

i’m not even going to put one of the viagra, cialis, etc. emails in here. Anyone buying that from spammers deserves what they get and I hope they spend every penny of their hard earned money for being dumb enough to click the links.

I know that sounds harsh and I hate being that way, but come on people, quit believing this garbage and the rest of us won’t have to hear it all the time.

Summer is here, and love is in the air!

So be ready when that special someone decides its time to spend some special quality time with you! The P Growth Patch will give you the edge you need to blow away your partner everytime!

She will love you more than she has loved any other man once you show her what a powerhouse you are between the sheet! Let the Pen is Growth Patch Rx supercharge you into a bedroom heavyweight champion!

Special Summer Discount special just started! Click here to visit our site and learn more about how much better life can be!

Guys . . . Dude . . . If you are clicking these links and buying this stuff, you need to know that your money would be better spent buying a shirt that doesn’t have stains on it, some deoderant, a decent haircut, some dental floss, and other things if you want women to talk to you.

Seriously, I feel bad for you if you are clicking and buying stuff because of emails like this. it will never help you. I’m not sure that anything will.

Ok I know I said no cialis, but I cannot resist.

Even if you have no erection problems Cialis would help you to make better sex more often and to bring unimaginable plesure to her. Just disolve half a pill under your tongue and get ready for action in 15 minutes! The tests showed that the majority of men after taking this medication were able to have perfect erection during 36 hours!

Dude . . . If you are with a girl who can’t give you an erection in 15 minutes, find another girl. If you really have problems from a medical standpoint, then see a real doctor. Spam will not cure your medical problems. And if you have an erection that lasts 36 hours . . . advertise.

Dear Customer, order a Pagerank 4 Textlink with your best keyword here: www.imascammer.com

- Each Word Link costs only 11.00 USD! - The most clicked Words were listed in the top ranking and will get more clicks additional that way! - Your Word will be linked for at least 3 years!

Google doesn’t like paid links. They won’t help you. And do you really think this link will be there for 3 years? Even if it is do you think that since they likely have 1000 links on every page that the link is worth having? Do you think legitimate websites send you spam to sell you a link? Cmon.

Our main aim is to render PC and Mac lawful software and computer solutions of low price for anyone. Whether you are a corporate buyer, a possessor of small business, or shopping for your home personal computer, we suppose that we can assist you.

ENJOY OF OUR SOFTWARE
http://wehavehackedsoftware.com

Most popular products:
*Microsoft Windows Vista Business: Retail price for this time - $299.00; Our only today - $79.95
*Microsoft Office 2007 Enterprise: Retail price for now - $899.00; Our now just - $79.95
*Adobe Creative Suite 2 Premium for Windows: Retail price now - $1199.00; Our just - $149.95
*Microsoft Windows XP Professional with SP2: Retail price for this time - $269.99; Our just - $49.95
*Adobe Acrobat 8.0 Professional: Retail price for now - $449.00; Our only - $79.95
*Adobe Photoshop CS3 Extended: Retail price this day - $999.00; Our only for today - $89.95
*Autodesk AutoCAD 2008: Retail price for this time - $6720.00; Our just - $129.95
*Microsoft Office XP Professional: Retail price today - $499.00; Our now just - $49.95

COME IN RIGHT NOW!
http://wearescammersandyouarestupid.com

If you are buying software from people who spam your email, you might be an idiot. Nuff said.

Great pharmaceutics from Canadian discount pharmacy.

The canadian pharmacy spammers are the best. The domain name they wanted me to click through and visit is registered to someone in Italy. I am sure there are a lot of canadian pharmacies in italy though.

People it is not that hard to recognize spammers and scammers.

If they tell you you won a lottery you never entered, then it is a scam. Don’t click the link “just in case it might be true”. It isn’t. period.

There are no former government officials or widows of former government officials somewhere in africa that need your help to get money into the US. None. There are none of these. This is not real. It never will be. And even if there were, they would not need your help and they would not be willing to share any of their money with you. They would not randomly send out an email to a random person they never met to make a deal like this. If you do not understand this, then someone really should be managing your money for you and just giving you a small allowance to buy food.

A pill will not make your penis bigger. Get over it.

If it sounds too good to be true, it is. If you got an email from someone you do not know wanting to make you rich, it is a scam. Please stop buying anything you get from unsolicited email so the spammers will slow down just a little.

I promise if you do not click a link in a spam email for 30 days, your penis will grow, you will have erections that last for 36 hours at a time, you will win the lottery, and google will rank your website number 1 for all of your keywords.


28 November 2007

How Large Charities Like The Red Cross Rip Us Off

posted in: Consumer Protection — Chris McElroy aka NameCritic @ 2:32 pm

Ok, before you say it, I already know that the red cross DOES help people and if you have been through a disaster, you know that they were there to help. This is not about the quality of service the red cross and others provide. It’s about how they get the money to do so and the end does not justify the means.

The red cross is just an example. All year they do fundraisers telling you they need money just in case a disaster happens. They take money from people who agreed to deduct it from their paychecks all year long to make sure they have the money to respond and help duiring a disaster.

Yet, as soon as a disaster happens, they run commercials to tell you they need money because a disaster has occured!

What happens to all that money they were raising in advance so they would be prepared? High salaries, plush offices, and a lot of stuff that isn’t really necessary.

No. I do not mind that someone gets paid for doing good work. I think they should be paid. But some of them are getting paid a ton of money when someone could have been found that really wants to do it for the right reasons and who will accept a reasonable salary.

Instead these charities reach out to the corporate world for their CEOs and Board members and say they need to pay high to compete with what the for profit corporations pay.

If you are a charity and you are hiring someone to run the charity who’s major concern is how much they will be paid, you should not be hiring them in the first place.

If you are a charity and your first concern is finding someone who is good at marketing and business rather than for their interest in the charitable work that you do, then you are at fault when your charity is more about collecting money than about accomplishing your mission and serving others.

Then when the charity is caught doing something wrong or it is getting bad press, they fire the CEO and say “There, everything is fixed now.”

Red Cross Fires Its President, Citing Relationship

The American Red Cross dismissed its president and chief executive, Mark W. Everson, yesterday, citing his “personal relationship with a subordinate employee.” He had been in office for only six months.

The news was another blow to an organization that has struggled to overcome criticism of its performance after Hurricane Katrina and other disasters, and it stunned the organization’s employees, as well as the nonprofit world at large.

“Although this is difficult and disappointing news for the Red Cross community, the organization remains strong and the life-saving mission of the American Red Cross will go forward,” Bonnie McElveen-Hunter, chairman of the Red Cross board, said in a statement.

See, we fired this guy and that solves all the problems relating to hurricane katrina and everything. We are AOK now!

The United Way is another one. The nes media talks about commercial fundraisers who call on the phone for doantions because they say the commercial fundraiser takes 75% of the money and the charity only receives 25%.

Each commercial fundraiser likely raises less than 1 million dollars per year gross. That means they kept $750,000 but paid for whatever entertainment the event had, paid for the insurance for the event, paid the payroll for the phone callers, paid the payroll taxes for the employees, and paid for everything else associated with the fundraising event. Which probably nets them about 25%. So the charity gets 25% and so does the commercial fundraiser.

The United Way has no charitable purpose, yet it is registered as a charity. What they do is raise money for charities. How are they any different than the commercial fundraisers and how do they get 501C3 status while the commercial fundraiser has to register as a commercial fundraiser?

The United Way says they only retain 25%. Yes, after paying all the same expenses that the commercial fundraiser had to pay. But even if they kept only 25% and paid the expenses out of that, you have to consider that they raise over 100 million dollars each year.

That means they keep 25 million dollars for processing your charitable donation and deciding who to give it to.

If you went ahead and decided which charity you wanted to give it to, then you would not have that 25% going to the United Way.

Figure this. You donate $1000 to the United Way. They take out $250 and pass the other $750 to the charity of their choice. Then that charity is also allowed to deduct 25% for their administration costs. So now you have made a $500 contribution. 50%. About the same as if you had just donated it through the commercial fundraiser over the phone.

The NCMEC, National Center For Missing And Exploited Childre gets more than 40 million dollars per year in government funding and donations. Yet, as far as finding missing children, they haven’t done anything at all. They have helped with online porn.

They have maintained a website that lists all the missing children. They claim that they have helped recover thousands of missing children.

Not true at all. Here is how it works. When a child is reported missing, law enforcement reports it to the NCIC, National Crime Information Center. Any missing child that is entered into NCIC is then also added to the NCMEC website.

If the police find the child 3 blocks away playing with friends, the police report the child found to NCIC. Then it is removed from the NCMEC database and the NCMEC tells us they have helped recover another missing child.

Now we all feel better because the NCMEC is doing such a great job so we are ok with them getting next year’s funding.

When charities get too large, they become businesses. They are there to make a profit. The NCMEC spends a million dollars or more each year on PR to make sure you know they are on the job while that money could be funding a real search team for missing children instead.

But these charities pay big money to hire the best PR people they can find. They work on showing the public an image and making people believe that charities they have never heard of should be avoided and that you should only give to charities whose name you recognize.

They know they do enough PR to make sure you recognize their names so they know that by convincing the public that name awareness equals legitimacy then they will get the bulk of the charity money that is available each year.

The truth is that if you want your charitable dollars to have the most impact, you should be looking around in your own community and finding those who are doing real charitible work that you can see. Give your money to them.

Better yet, do not donate to a charity until you have volunteered with them for at least one day so you can really see what they do. Any charity that tells you they only need your money and not your time should send you running the other way.


27 November 2007

Insurance Companies Take No Risks

posted in: Consumer Protection — Chris McElroy aka NameCritic @ 4:19 am

The whole idea behind insurance is to reduce the consumer’s risk from natural disasters and emergencies. The insurance companies are supposed to be able to manage that risk by charging premiums to people knowing that the majority of them will never need to make a claim.

Homeowners face rising insurance rates
By M.P. McQueen
The Wall Street Journal
with Pantagraph reports

Still reeling from an estimated $56 billion of hurricane-related losses, major insurers are dropping policies or not writing new ones in coastal areas from Texas to Florida and up the Eastern Seaboard as far north as Massachusetts.

Yet during this same period, insurance companies are reporting large profits. reporting on how much they had to payout is their way of justifying the raising of rates and dropping policies. They don’t report their profits while claiming all of these losses to make it sound like they are really hurting.

Insurers including Allstate Corp. and Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co. say they need to reduce the financial risk that could come with fresh storms as soon as this year. But the moves have left homeowners in a number of states scrambling to find new coverage, often at higher cost.

Some home insurers also are winning regulatory approval to raise premiums in states hit by hurricanes Katrina, Wilma and Rita.

Now, rate increases are expected to spread far beyond those areas, as the industry comes under new pressures related to hurricanes.

So basically, if there is any risk of actually having to pay anything out, they will just not write the policy. So the only policies they are willing to write or willing to charge an affordable rate for aren’t really for people who need them in the first place.

If you have no risk or minimal risk, you really don’t need the insurance that much. The insurance companies will sell it to you though. They will offer you a ton of coverage for things they know are likely to never happen.

If you have some risk, they will either cancel your policy or charge you more than your mortgage for your homeowners insurance.

Then if you do make a claim they will fight like hell to keep from paying you. If there are a lot of claims in an area, they will run to the government to pay you with your own tax dollars. So they don’t even carry risk when there is risk.

I know people in Florida that have had their rates raised by 500% in just one year.

Reinsurance companies, whose business it is to insure the insurers, have begun charging sharply higher prices in anticipation that hurricanes will become more frequent and more intense, and some primary insurers say they will try to recoup these added costs from consumers.

Allstate, the nation’s second biggest home insurer, after State Farm Insurance Cos., says it plans to seek premium increases in a “majority” of the 49 states in which it does business to help offset higher reinsurance costs.

They did this “anticipating” a rough hurricane season. We didn’t have one. They won’t be lowering rates as a result of an easy hurricane season.

This is the deal. We have a bad hurricane season, they raise the rates by a lot. They justify it by talking about how much it cost them that season. Then we go a couple of years without hurricane damage and they still keep the rates high.

The way it should be working is that when the season doesn’t bring a lot of hurricane season makes up for the times when they had to pay out due to damage. Then insurance rates could basically stay the same every year and in some years the insurance companies would profit a lot, other years they would profit less because of payouts.

But the insurance companies have found a way to keep profits high every year, whether there are bad storms or not.

In Massachusetts, some homeowners already are paying higher premiums as insurers abandon certain local markets.

While the state hasn’t experienced a devastating hurricane in more than 50 years, insurance companies, including Andover Cos. and Hingham Mutual Group, increasingly are refusing to write homeowners’ policies on Cape Cod and on the islands of Nantucket and Martha’s Vineyard, where many of the East Coast elite keep vacation homes.

So much for basing their costs on what really happens. They say they are raising rates along the gulf coast because of recent hurricane activity while in states where there has not been recent hurricanes they are still raising the rates.

The other scam the insurance companies pulled was the separation of different types of coverage. It used to be when you bought homeowners insurance that you were basically covered for whatever happens.

Then they got slick and started separating out the types of coverage. So you insure your home, but need separate coverage for wind damage, separate coverage for flood damage, separate coverage for lightning damage, etc.

So they have left it to you to predict what might happen and make sure you have specific coverage for that type of damage. They know the average homeowner cannot predict this.

Insurance companies are experts at predicting what might happen according to where you live and other factors. In the old days the insurance salesman would help homeowners choose the right policy by using that information.

Now they do just the opposite. Their goal is to sell you as much insurance as they can for the things that are unlikely to happen while not advising you to buy coverage for the things that might actually happen.

The Rest of The Story here


23 November 2007

Insurance Companies Ripping Off The Public

posted in: Consumer Protection — Chris McElroy aka NameCritic @ 3:59 pm

Now this really pisses me off. Insurance companies have been bilki9ng the public for a long time now. They take our money, then they invest it in the stock market, real estate, or whatever else they think will improve their bottom line for their investors.

Then whenever a big disaster hits, like 9-11 for instance, katrina, etc., they cry to the government to bail them out.

They buy up insurance policies on buildings in japan knowing full well there could be a big earthquake there at any time and knowing they would not be able to cover it if it did happen. But fortunately for them they also know they can run to our government to be bailed out.

They threaten that if the insurance companies went belly up it would hurt the stock market and the economy so the government has to bail them out.

So we pay the premiums, then when a disaster hits, they get our tax money to pay for it while they use the premiums for investments and profit. We get it going and coming. Now they want us to pay again.

Insurers Shift Cost Burdens to Homeowners
By JOSEPH B. TREASTER of the NYTimes

American homeowners are having to make do with much less coverage at steadily rising prices. In Miami and other places along the coast, insurance prices have skyrocketed, deepening the national slowdown in home sales.

The cutbacks in coverage, consumer advocates say, have contributed to the slow recovery of the Gulf Coast from Hurricane Katrina and will most likely hamper recovery from the recent wildfires in California.

“You have a different mentality at the insurance companies,” said Andrew Barile, a consultant who has spent his life in the industry. “They no longer worry about the public service aspect. They’re concentrating on the bottom line.”

The bottom line has been good recently. The property insurance industry, including home, auto and commercial coverages, reported a record profit of $44 billion in 2005, even after paying $41 billion in damages from Katrina. The industry set another record for profit in 2006 at $64 billion. And as a second hurricane season is coming to an end without a hurricane hitting the coasts, 2007 is shaping up to be another lucrative year.

Ten years ago, for example, the average cost of home insurance in America was $455 a year.

Today, it is an estimated $886 for much less insurance. Along the coastlines, annual premiums on houses routinely run into the thousands of dollars. Contending that even those premiums are not high enough for the risk they face, the insurers have canceled or declined to renew several million policies.

Two years ago, the annual cost of coverage for Mr. Williams, a retired airline pilot, and his wife, a former flight attendant, rose more than 50 percent to $2,599, for about $250,000 in coverage.

The Bush administration is not helping either. Bush is so pro-big-business that all corporations have been pushing the limits as to what they can get away with because they know they have an ally in the white house.

The FCC is letting media companies buy out smaller newspapers, radio stations and tv stations, relaxing the rules put into place to assure diversity in the news we listen to, watch or read.

The EPA is virtually nonexistant as far as controlling pollution.

The FDA will approve anything the pharmeceutical companies tell them to and they got Bush to support a drug plan for seniors and prohibeted the government from being able to negotiate for better drug prices on their behalf.

The SEC isn’t doing anything to curb investment fraud even though they made it appear that something would happen after enron, worldcom, tyco, and others ripped everyone off. Pretty much putting martha stewart in jail is supposed to prove they are tough on corporate crime.

Try taking a grievance against an employer to the US Dept. of Labor or your state’s dept. of labor. Nothing will happen to an employer who doesn’t pay you or doesn’t provide the benefits they promised.

The Consumer protection Agency can’t even stop wal-mart, mattel, and other big companies from selling toys to our kids that contain lead.

And it’s obvious that the Insurance Commissioners are doing nothing at all to protect consumers.

The reason all of these government agencies that are supposed to protect us are not doing so?

Politicians posture and try to look good while creating these agencies for our protection, then when they write the budget, corporate lobbyists make sure the agencies do not get enough funding to do their jobs. Thats te game that allows the politicians to look good while the corporate lobbyists make sure nothing will happen to their clients from these agencies.

Sure talk about the EPA all you want senator, just make sure you don’t give them the money to actually investigate or spot check any violators.

Sure, have an insurance commissioner, but make sure you choose someone friendly to the industry who won’t make any waves.

And of course anyone chosen to head the SEC should be friendly to brokerages and who has a good relationship with a lot of the top CEOs so we can make sure that our books don’t get looked at too carefully.

Even George Bush violated SEC rules when he ran a corporation where his daddy got him a job and of course absolutely nothing happened to him then either.


1 November 2007

Internet Scams As Seen On TV

posted in: Consumer Protection — Chris McElroy aka NameCritic @ 8:49 am

I was just watching this commercial on tv. They tell me for just $1 I can start my online business with everything I need to be successful. My worries are over right?

As usual, wrong. People really should get it thorugh their heads that if it sounds too good to be true it is. Especially where tv commercials come into play.

The commercial was for 24.mydollardomain.com. For just $1 you get a domain name and you can use sitebuilder to build your website and start making money right away!

Only when you actually read the terms of service you see where the suspicious part of it come in.

Dollar Website Details

Welcome to MyDomain’s $1 trial offer. You will receive the use of a domain of your choosing, plus a Standard Shared Hosting (Windows only) package with SiteBuilder® in this exclusive 30-day risk-free trial offer; it has everything you need to design and launch your own website.

If for any reason you are unhappy with your domain name and/or hosting plan during the first 30 days, you can cancel by simply clicking on the “cancel” button on the account management page in your account.

Sound good so far?

If you cancel during the 30-day trial period, the domain will become the property of MyDomain.*

So in other words you are not really registering a domain name. They are. And if you cancel, they keep it. That means it was never your domain name at all.

If you do not cancel your service within 30 days, you will be automatically billed $8.95 for the one-year registration of your domain name, and $32.85 for a three-month subscription of your hosting plan 31 days after you order the trial offer. Your credit card will then be billed $32.85 every three months for your quarterly hosting subscription, and $8.95** annually for the one-year domain registration. If at any time your credit card cannot be authorized for the required amount, your service will cease.

And everything reverts to them. That means if they get people to work hard at getting some traffic, then they don’t pursue it anymore, as many people don’t, then they can monetize the traffic you worked to build.

The $1 paid for the trial offer is applied to the 30-day Standard Shared Hosting (Windows only) package. If you actively cancel your domain during the trial offer, or if your credit card cannot be authorized for the purchase after the trial period ends, then your domain will become the property of MyDomain.*

The $1 MyDomain 30-day trial offer is for a limited time only. This offer is limited to one per household and one per account and is not valid with any other offer. This offer is available only for new domain name registrations of .com, .net, .org, info., and .biz. This offer applies only to domains registered with MyDomain. MyDomain reserves the right to request additional information for proper order processing and/or the right to reject any order.

* See Registration Agreement and ICANN regulations for further details.

** One-year registration fee subject to change.

That last really cool statement means if you get a lot of traffic and you begin to have some success, they reserve the right to raise the cost of that domain name each year. It’s completely up to them. Now of course I’m not saying they are scammers and would do such a thing, but they reserve the right to do it anyway.

And this is from the terms of service at mydomains.com which really owns this great one dollar offer.

You understand and acknowledge that MyDomain.com is not itself a registrar of domain names, but offers such registration services on its Website as a service to its members by providing registration pages and links to official sellers and registrars of domain names.

Members are under no obligation to use any of the domain registration services available at MyDomain.com. If you use any of the domain registration services on the MyDomain.com Website you will also be subject to the Registration Agreement of the registrar for such domains, current Namesdirect.com.

My point is stop trying to get something for nothing. It’s much better to use a well-known and trusted registrar like enom.com, godaddy.com, register.com, or networksolutions.com than to try to get soemthing for nothing. it almost always ends badly.

The fact that they control the domain name should be enough to scare you away. When you register a domain name, it should have your whois info on it. You should have control of the domain name you registered, period. Anything short of that is a scam in my opinion.

Some hosting companies and web design companies do the same thing. They know clients don’t know any better so they register the domain name in their own name instead of the client’s name. Then if you ever try to leave them for another company, they “decide” how much they should charge you to keep your own domain name.

Don’t get ripped off.


23 October 2007

Border Security Has Nothing To Do With Security

posted in: Consumer Protection — Chris McElroy aka NameCritic @ 4:51 am

Take it from someone who has crossed the border to and from mexico more than most people. The increased funding for more agents at the border is disguised as being for homeland security purposes and to look for terrorists.

The white house has sold this to the american public based on that lie. The increased scrutiny at the border is about confiscating more drugs. The white house knows the public got tired of a war on drugs that has accomplished nothing in years and that it would be much easier to get that funding based on the threat of terrorists crossing the border.

They use that fear for everything else, why not for the drug war too? Where are the results if the white house isn’t lying about what the funding is really for? Drug confiscations and arrests at the border are up. That is a good thing. But how many terrorists have been caught or stopped due to the billions in new funding? Show me some stats.

From the NYTimes
By JULIA PRESTON
Published: October 21, 2007

United States border agents have stepped up scrutiny of Americans returning home from Mexico, slowing commerce and creating delays at border crossings not seen since the months after the Sept. 11 attacks.

The increased enforcement is in part a dress rehearsal for new rules, scheduled to take effect in January, that will require Americans to show a passport or other proof of citizenship to enter the United States. The requirements were approved by Congress as part of antiterrorism legislation in 2004.

The second real goal of this extra funding is because many americans now live in mexico. Many retired to live there because they cannot live in the US on what social security pays them.

This results in loss of revenue in the US. Many on social security now live under a new rule that says if you withdraw more than 50% of your social security check while you are in mexico, you could lose your social security altogether.,

The US does not want these retirees living in mexico and are doing their best to keep them from doing so, including the hassles listed above in this article. They want to track them and the number of times they go to mexico and come back. Many of them have to bank on the US side of the border so their visits to the US will correspond with the withdrawals from their accounts and this information can be used against them.

Funds for the Border Patrol, which scouts the border between entry points for illegal immigrants, increased by 70 percent since 2005 to $3 billion. By contrast, financing for border station agents, who processed nearly 300 million travelers entering the country legally by land last year, rose by 30 percent since 2005, to $2.1 billion.

Also in August, border officials said, the Department of Homeland Security issued a directive designed to unify inspection procedures for all the border agencies under its umbrella. It set an eventual goal, with no fixed deadline, for agents to conduct a database query for every person crossing the border.

If it was just about stopping terrorists why would they need to stop every single person that crosses the border for a database query? Grandma over there looks like a terrorist?


12 October 2007

Homeland Security and Border Patrol Agents

posted in: Consumer Protection — Chris McElroy aka NameCritic @ 10:20 pm

When is this going to be resolved or has it been?


25 August 2007

Scary People In Charge Of Government And Security

posted in: Consumer Protection — Chris McElroy aka NameCritic @ 8:41 am

OK, we have made fun of GW Bush for quotes like “Our children IS Learning More.” and “Nucular” instead of Nuclear”, but he is not the only one we need to pay attention to.

Having an illiterate president that believes it is everyone else who is illiterate is not our only problem. However, do listen carefully to any bush speech. He will tell you something, then say, “In Other Words”, and tell you again because he thinks you are too stupid to have understood it the first time.

An example was on the bridge collapse recently. Bush said “We need to prioritize those things in building our infrastructure, and when I say we need to prioritize, I mean we need to make this a priority.”

And this is the guy that runs our country, decides which wars to take on, decides whether or not to continue the space program, and other “Prioritzed Issues”.

Now let’s check out another person in charge of gathering “INTELLIGENCE”, National Intelligence Director Mike McConnell.

Transcript: Debate on the foreign intelligence surveillance act
By Chris Roberts / ©El Paso Times
Article Launched: 08/22/2007 01:05:57 AM MDT

The following is the transcript of a question and answer session with National Intelligence Director Mike McConnell.

Question: How much has President Bush or members of his administration formed your response to the FISA debate?

Answer: Not at all. When I came back in, remember my previous assignment was director of the NSA, so this was an area I have known a little bit about.

The former Director of the NSA knew “A Little” about FISA. Like, “Yeah I heard of that. Some kind of court right?” lol

So I came back in. I was nominated the first week of January. The administration had made a decision to put the terrorist surveillance program into the FISA court.

You mean made a decision as in like they had to because the laws said so? So the bush administration “decided” to comply with the law, so they should get credit for thinking of it?

I think that happened the 7th of Jan. So as I come in the door and I’m prepping for the hearings, this sort of all happened. So the first thing I want to know is what’s this program and what’s the background and I was pretty surprised at what I learned.

I bet.

First off, the issue was the technology had changed and we had worked ourselves into a position that we were focusing on foreign terrorist communications, and this was a terrorist foreigner in a foreign country.

Technology changing, yeah that is rough. “We worked ourselves into a position . . .” “Foriegn Terrorist was a foriegn terrorist in a foriegn country?” Ok, I think we got you so far here. Please continue.

The issue was international communications are on a wire

You mean wiretap?

so all of a sudden we were in a position because of the wording in the law that we had to have a warrant to do that.

Yeah, that pesky wording in the law just gets in the way of things, doesn’t it. So in other words the wiretaps were illegal and bush did it anyway, but you say, “all of a sudden we were in a position because of the wording in the law.”

Yeah, that bank I robbed put me in a position because of the wording in the law that makes it illegal. Would that be a similar statement?

So the most important thing to capture is that it’s a foreigner in a foreign country, required to get a warrant.

Wait. Now it’s the foreigner in a foreign country that needs the warrant?

Now if it were wireless, we would not be required to get a warrant.

Wow. That’s convenient. So if I understand you so far, A foriegner in a foreign country needs a warrant so you can wiretap him, but a foreigner would not need a warrant to buy a cell phone?

Plus we were limited in what we were doing to terrorism only

Yeah, probably something to do with that pesky wording in the law.

and the last time I checked we had a mission called foreign intelligence

The last time you checked? Just when was that?

which should be construed to mean anything of a foreign intelligence interest, North Korea, China, Russia, Syria, weapons of mass destruction proliferation, military development and it goes on and on and on.

Oprah Winfrey, OJ Simpson, Michael Vick, Judge Judy, Paris Hilton, Tom Cruise, and anything else we want to add to the list so that you can basically wiretap anything you want? “it goes on and on and on”. I bet it does.

So when I engaged with the administration, I said we’ve gotten ourselves into a position here where we need to clarify

But you didn’t say that it was illegal. We just need to “clarify” it. Good twist.

so the FISA issue had been debated and legislation had been passed in the house in 2006, did not pass the Senate. Two bills were introduced in the Senate, I don’t know if it was co-sponsorship or two different bills, but Sen. (Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif.) had a bill and Sen. Specter had a bill and it may have been the same bill, I don’t know, but the point is a lot of debate, a lot of dialogue.

Ok. Too easy. Not even going to add to that. Yes I am . . The bill was a bill, that really wasn’t two bills instead of one bill. The one bill superceded the other bill, I think, wait, it was two bills and a duck . . .

So, it was submitted to the FISA court and the first ruling in the FISA court was what we needed to do we could do with an approval process that was at a summary level and that was OK,

Nice of them to agree to let you do it, but how can a court decision be retroactive? It wasn’t legal when you started doing it.

we stayed in business and we’re doing our mission. Well in the FISA process, you may or may not be aware …

We are now.

The Rest of The Story here

News and Media Blog
Most Wanted Fugitives Blog
Who Let The Blog Out?
Things That Just Piss Me Off


« comment



« + newer posts
 

Quote of the Day

As long as you eat in time
You will never go hungry

McMike - 1999



News and Media Blog  Who Let The Blog Out?

Powered by mijzelf !! en MainCore